UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrantx                             Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

xDefinitive Proxy Statement

 

¨Definitive Additional Materials

 

 

BofI HOLDING, INC.

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

 

 

N/A

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

 

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

xNo fee required

 

¨Fee Computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11.

 

 (1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

 (2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

 (3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

  

 

 (4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

  

 

 (5)Total fee paid:

 

  

 

 

 

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2), and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 (1)Amount Previously Paid:

 

  

 

 (2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

  

 

 (3)Filing Party:

 

  

 

 (4)Date Filed:

 

  

 


BOFI HOLDING, INC.

September 27, 201020, 2011

Dear Shareholder:

TheOn behalf of the Board of Directors and I would like to extendmanagement of BofI Holding, Inc. (the “Company”), you a cordial invitationare cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of BofI Holding, Inc. (the “Company”the Company (“Annual Meeting”). The meetingAnnual Meeting will be held on Thursday, October 21, 201020, 2011 at 2:00 PM at the Estancia La JollaMarriott Hotel 9700 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla,– Carmel Valley/Del Mar, 11966 El Camino Real, San Diego, California 92037.92130.

The attached Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement describe in detail the matters to be acted on at the meeting. An important part of the Annual Meeting is the shareholder vote on corporate business items. We also will discuss the operations of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Bank of Internet USA (the “Bank”).

Your participation in Company activities is important and we hopeencourage you will attend.

to attend the meeting in person if it is convenient to do so. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, please be sure to complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the accompanying postage-paid reply envelope, so that your shares may be voted in accordance with your wishes. Returning the enclosed proxy will not prevent you from voting in person if you choose to attend the Annual Meeting.

On behalf of the Board of Directors and all of the employees of the Company, we thank you for your continued support.

 

Sincerely,
LOGO

Gregory Garrabrants

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

12777 High Bluff Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92130 858/350-6200


BOFI HOLDING, INC.

12777 High Bluff Drive, Suite 100

San Diego, CA 92130

 

 

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To Be Held October 21, 201020, 2011

NOTICE TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF BOFI HOLDING, INC.

The 2010Notice is hereby given that the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of BofI Holding, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held at the Estancia La JollaMarriott Hotel 9700 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla,– Carmel Valley/Del Mar, 11966 El Camino Real, San Diego, California 92037,92130, on Thursday, October 21, 201020, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Pacific Time, for the following purposes:

1.Election of Directors. To elect the following two nominees to serve asItem 1. To elect three Class I directors, each to hold office for a three-year term or until their successors are elected and have qualified:

Edward J. Ratinoff and Gordon L. Witter, Jr.until a successor is elected and qualified;

2.Ratification of Crowe Horwath LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year.

3.To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Only ShareholdersItem 2. To approve, in a non-binding and advisory vote, the compensation of record atthe Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders;

Item 3. To recommend, in a non-binding and advisory vote, whether future non-binding and advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation should occur every year, every two years or every three years;

Item 4. To approve the performance-based incentive award structure in the President and Chief Executive Officer’s May 26, 2011 employment agreement to allow the Company to take federal income tax deductions for performance-based compensation paid in accordance with the employment agreement;

Item 5. To ratify, in an advisory vote, the selection of Crowe Horwath LLP to audit the Company’s financial statements for fiscal year 2012; and

Item 6. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on September 1, 2010 areAugust 26, 2011 as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

 

  By order of the Board of Directors,
   LOGO
September 27, 201020, 2011  Gregory Garrabrants
  President and Chief Executive Officer

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT.IMPORTANT: WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU SHOULD COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY. RETURNING THE ENCLOSED PROXY WILL ENSURE THAT YOUR VOTE WILL BE COUNTED AND IT WILL NOT PREVENT YOU FROM VOTING IN PERSON IF YOU CHOOSE TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING.


Table of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTS

 

   Page

PROXY STATEMENT

  1

ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

  45

Board Nominees – 2010CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

  48

Current Directors – Terms expire after 2010COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

  5

Corporate Governance

10
  7

Committees of the Board of Directors

9

PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK

  1112

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

  1213

Compensation of Non-Employee DirectorsCOMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

  1314

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

  17

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

18
  17

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

24

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

  3033

ITEM 2. NON-BINDING VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

34

ITEM  3. NON-BINDING VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF NON-BINDING STOCKHOLDER VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

35

ITEM  4. APPROVAL OF THE PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE AWARD STRUCTURE IN THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S MAY 26, 2011 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT TO ALLOW COMPANY TO TAKE FEDERAL INCOME TAX DEDUCTIONS

36

RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND OTHER MATTERS

  3037

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

  3137

COMPANY STOCK PERFORMANCE

  3238

ITEM 2.5. RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

  33

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

39
  33

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

  3440

ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS

41

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 20112012 ANNUAL MEETING

  3541

OTHER MATTERS

  3642

 

i


BOFI HOLDING, INC.

12777 High Bluff Drive, Suite 100

San Diego, CA 92130

 

 

PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

To Be Held at 2:00 PM Pacific Time, October 21, 201020, 2011

 

 

INTRODUCTION

This Proxy Statement is furnished to you in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of BofI Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board” and the “Company”, respectively), for use at the 20102011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held on Thursday, October 21, 2010,20, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Pacific Time, at the Estancia La JollaMarriott Hotel 9700 N. Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037– Carmel Valley/Del Mar, 11966 El Camino Real, San Diego, CA 92130 and at any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Annual Meeting”). This Proxy Statement and the accompanying proxy card are first being mailed to shareholders on or about September 27, 2010.20, 2011.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BY COMPLETING, SIGNING AND DATING THE PROXY CARD ENCLOSED WITH THIS PROXY STATEMENT AND RETURNING IT IN THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE.

Some shareholders may have their shares registered in different names or hold shares in different capacities. For example, a shareholder may have some shares registered in his or her name, individually, and others in his or her capacity as a custodian for minor children or as a trustee of a trust. In that event, you will receive multiple copies of this Proxy Statement and multiple proxy cards.If you want all of your votes to be counted, please be sure to sign, date and return all of those proxy cards.

Who May Vote?is entitled to vote?

If you were a ShareholderOnly shareholders on the records of the Company at the close of business on September 1, 2010, youAugust 26, 2011, the “record date”, may vote at the 20102011 Annual Meeting, either in person or by proxy. On that day, there were 10,201,263As of the record date, we had 10,420,808 shares of our common stock outstanding and entitled to be voted.

How Many Votes Do I Have?What constitutes a quorum?

Each share is entitled to one vote; except that if any shareholder in attendance at the Annual Meeting announces an intention to cumulate votes in the election of directors prior to the voting, then all shareholders will be entitled to cumulate votes in that election. In an election of directors held by cumulative voting, each shareholder is entitled to cast a number of votes that is equal to the number of directors to be elected (which at this Annual Meeting will be two) multiplied by the number of shares which the shareholder is entitled to vote at the Meeting, and to cast all of those votes for a single nominee or to distribute them among the two nominees in such proportions as the shareholder may choose.

In order to vote, you must either designate a proxy to vote on your behalf, or attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person. The Board of Directors requests your proxy so that your shares will count toward a quorum and be voted at the Annual Meeting.

How Will The Board Vote My Proxy?

A properly executed proxy received by us prior to the Annual Meeting, and not revoked, will be voted as directed by the shareholder on that proxy. If a shareholder provides no specific direction, the shares will be votedFOR the election of the Directors nominated by the Board andFORthe ratification of Crowe Horwath LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

If any other matter should be presented at the Annual Meeting upon which a vote may properly be taken, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted in accordance with the judgment of the holders of the proxy. However, if your stock is held in a brokerage account or by a nominee, please read the information below under caption “How Do I Vote Shares Held by Brokers, Banks and Other Nominees?” and “What Vote is Required to Take Action” regarding how your shares may be voted.

How Do I Vote?

Voting by Proxy.Shareholders may complete, sign, date and return their proxy cards in the postage-prepaid return envelope provided. If you sign and return your proxy card without indicating how you want to vote, your proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors (except, as described below, for shares held by brokers, banks and other nominees). If you forget to sign your proxy card, your shares cannot be voted. However, if you sign your proxy card but forget to date it, your shares will still be voted as you have directed. You should, however, date your proxy card, as well as sign it.

Voting In Person at the Annual Meeting.Alternatively, you may attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. However, if your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a nominee holder, you will need to contact the broker or the nominee holder to obtain a proxy that will enable you to vote your shares in person at the Annual Meeting.

How Do I Vote Shares Held by Brokers, Banks and Other Nominees?

If you hold your shares of common stock in a broker, bank or nominee account, you are the “beneficial owner” of those shares, holding them in “street name.” In order to vote your shares, you must give voting instructions to your broker, bank, or other intermediary who is the “nominee holder” of your shares. We ask brokers, banks and other nominee holders to obtain voting instructions from the beneficial owners of our common stock. Proxies that are transmitted by nominee holders on your behalf will count toward a quorum and will be voted as instructed by you as beneficial holder of the shares. If you fail to provide voting instructions to your broker or other nominee, your broker or other nominee will have discretion to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting for the election of the Board’s Director nominees (unless there is a “counter-solicitation” or your broker has knowledge of a “contest,” as those terms are used in the New York Stock Exchange Rules).

What Vote is Required to Take Action?

Quorum Requirement. Our Bylaws require that a quorum – that is, the holders of a majority of all of the shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting – be present, in person or by proxy, before any business may be transacted at the Annual Meeting (other than adjourning the Annual Meeting to a later date to allow time to obtain additional proxies to satisfy the quorum requirement).

How do I vote by proxy before the meeting?

Votes Required to Elect Directors.Assuming a quorumBefore the meeting, you may vote your shares in one of the shareholdersfollowing three ways if your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A.:

By Internet atwww.investorvote.com/BOFI

By telephone from the USA, US territories and Canada any time on a touch tone telephone call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683)

By mail by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the postage paid envelope provided.

Please refer to the proxy card for further instructions on voting via the Internet and by telephone.

Please follow the directions on your proxy card carefully. If your shares are held in a brokerage account in the name of a broker or other nominee (this is present in person orcalled “street name”), then you are the beneficial owner of the shares and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by proxythat organization. The organization holding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the Annual Meeting, a plurality ofannual meeting. You have the votes cast is required for the election of Directors. As a result, the two nominees who receive the highest number of votes cast will be elected.

Any shares votedright to “Withhold Authority” will have no effectdirect your broker on the outcome of the election of directors at the Annual Meeting. Broker non-votes, which relate to shares for which “street” or “nominee” holders do not obtain voting instructions from the beneficial holders and cannot or do not choosehow to vote the shares in your account, and your ability to vote by telephone or via the Internet depends on the voting procedures used by your broker. You may receive a discretionary basis, are not counted as votes cast. However,separate voting instruction form with this proxy statement, or you may need to contact your broker or other nominee to determine whether you will be able to vote electronically using the Internet or telephone.

May I vote my shares voted to Withhold Authority and broker non-votes are considered presentin person at the meeting?

Yes. You may vote your shares at the meeting for purposes of determining whetherif you attend in person, even if you previously submitted a quorum is present.proxy card or voted by Internet or telephone. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, we encourage you to vote your shares by proxy before the meeting. Please note that if your shares are held in “street name” and you wish to vote at the meeting, you will not be permitted to do so unless you first obtain a legal proxy issued in your name from the broker, bank or nominee that holds your shares.

How Cancan I Revoke My Proxy?revoke my proxy?

If you are a registered owner and have sent in your proxy, you may change your vote by revoking your proxy by means of any one of the following actions which, to be effective, must be taken before your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting:

 

Sending a written notice to revoke your proxy to the Secretary of the Company at 12777 High Bluff Drive, Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92130. To be effective, the Company must receive the notice of revocation before the Annual Meeting commences.

 

Transmitting a proxy by mail at a later date than your prior proxy. To be effective, the Company must receive the later dated proxy before the Annual Meeting commences. If you fail to date or to sign that later proxy, however, it will not be treated as a revocation of an earlier dated proxy.

 

Attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person or by proxy in a manner different than the instructions contained in your earlier proxy.

However,

How many votes do I have?

Each share is entitled to one vote. In order to vote, you must either designate a proxy to vote on your behalf, or attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person. The Board of Directors requests your proxy so that your shares will count toward a quorum and be voted at the Annual Meeting.

How will the Board vote my proxy?

A properly executed proxy received by us prior to the Annual Meeting, and not revoked, will be voted as directed by the shareholder on that proxy. If a shareholder provides no specific direction, the shares will be voted as follows:

FOR the election of the directors nominated by the Board (Item 1);

FORthe approval, in a non-binding and advisory vote, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement (Item 2);

FORthe recommendation, in a non-binding and advisory vote, that future non-binding and advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation shall occur every THREE YEARS (Item 3);

FOR the approval of the performance-based incentive award structure in the President and Chief Executive Officer’s May 26, 2011 employment agreement to allow the Company to take federal income tax deductions for performance-based compensation paid in accordance with the employment agreement (Item 4);

FOR the ratification, in an advisory vote, of the selection of Crowe Horwath LLP to audit the Company’s financial statements for fiscal year 2012 (Item 5).

With respect to any other matter that properly comes before the meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by the Board or, if no recommendation is given, in their own discretion.

What vote is required to approve each item?

Election of Directors. Assuming a quorum of the shareholders is present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting, a plurality of the votes cast is required for the election of directors. As a result, the three nominees who receive the highest number of votes cast will be elected as Class I directors. Proxies received but marked as abstentions, withheld votes and broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the meeting. Abstentions include shares present in person but not voting and shares represented by proxy but with respect to which the holder has abstained from voting. Broker non-votes occur when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power on that item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner.

Non-Binding Vote to Approve the Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on this item will be required for the non-binding approval of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. Abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to this proposal will not be counted as a vote cast and, therefore, will have no effect on this non-binding vote.

Non-Binding Vote to Recommend the Frequency of A Non-Binding Stockholder Vote to Approve the Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers. You may vote in favor of holding future non-binding votes on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers every year, every two years or every three years, or you may choose to abstain. The non-binding recommendation of the shareholders will be the alternative receiving the highest number of votes. Abstentions and broker non-votes with respect to this proposal will not be counted as a vote cast and, therefore, will have no effect on this non-binding vote.

Other Items. For each other item, the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the item will be required for approval. A properly executed proxy marked “ABSTAIN” with respect to any such matter will not be voted, although it will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum. Because abstentions represent shares entitled to vote on any matter presented for stockholder approval, the effect of an abstention will be the same as a vote against a proposal.

Effect of Broker Non-Votes. If you hold your shares in “street name” through a broker or other nominee, holder holds your shares, you will need to contact your broker or nominee may not be permitted to exercise voting discretion with respect to some of the nominee holdermatters to be acted upon. Thus, if you wishdo not give your broker or nominee specific instructions, your shares may not be voted on those matters and will not be counted in determining the number of shares necessary for approval. Shares represented by such “broker non-votes” will, however, be counted in determining whether there is a quorum.

Can I exercise rights of appraisal or other dissenters’ rights?

No. Under Delaware law, holders of our voting stock are not entitled to revoke your proxy.demand appraisal of their shares or exercise similar rights of dissenters as a result of the approval of any of the proposals to be presented at the annual meeting.

ITEM 1. ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Board Nominees - 2011

TwoThree Class I directors will be elected at the Annual Meeting, each to hold office for a three-year term expiring at the 20132014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Meeting or until their successors area successor is elected and have qualified. The Board of Directors has nominated the twothree persons named below for election to the Board. Unless otherwise instructed, the proxy holders named in the enclosed proxy intend to vote the proxies received by them for the election of these nominees. If, prior to the Annual Meeting, any nominee of the Board of Directors becomes unable to serve as a director, the proxy holders will vote the proxies received by them for the election of a substitute nominee selected by the Board of Directors.

Vote Required and Recommendation of the Board of Directors

The twoIf a quorum is present and voting, the three Class I nominees receiving the mosthighest number of votes cast in the election of Directors by holders of shares of common stock present or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the Meeting will be elected to serve as Directors of the Company for the ensuing three years. As a result, shares as to which the authority to vote is withheld, which will be counted, and broker non-votes, which will not be counted, will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors.

If any record shareholder gives notice at the Annual Meeting of his or her intention to cumulate votes in the election of Directors, the proxy holders shall have the discretion to allocate and cast the votes represented by the proxies they hold among the nominees named below in such proportions as they deem appropriate in order to elect as many of those nominees as is possible.Board.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED BELOW.

BoardDirector Nominees - 2010

The following provides information regarding each of the nominees selected by the Board for election to the Company’s Board of Directors at the 20102011 Annual Meeting, including their age and the year in which they first became a director of the Company, their business experience, the name of publicly-held companies (other than the Company), where they currently serve as a director or served as a director during the past five years, if any, and additional information about the specific experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that led to the Board’s conclusion that such person should serve as a director for the Company:

Edward J. Ratinoff. Mr. Ratinoff, age 45, has served as a member of the Board ofClass I Directors of the Company since April 2010 and is Chairman of the Bank’s Internal Asset Review (IAR) Committee.

Mr. Ratinoff’s prior experience, qualifications and attributes include being a Managing Director and Head of Acquisitions for Phoenix Realty Group, an institutional real estate investment firm focused on opportunistic multifamily investments. Mr. Ratinoff oversees the investment program for two fund vehicles totaling approximately $400 million– Terms to expire in equity, directs acquisition teams in Los Angeles and New York, and is a member of the firm’s investment committee. Prior to joining Phoenix Realty Group, Mr. Ratinoff held the position of Managing Director and west coast head for the J.E. Robert Companies. In this role, Mr. Ratinoff was responsible for all equity and debt transactions throughout the western United States for the real estate investment funds sponsored by the firm and was a member of the investment committees for both JER Partners and JER Investors Trust (NYSE: JRT). Mr. Ratinoff was also responsible for directing JER’s multifamily investment strategy in the United States, acquiring 2,300 apartment units in Seattle, Atlanta and Detroit. During his tenure Mr. Ratinoff led the acquisition of approximately $1.0 billion in assets representing multiple real estate sectors and geographies. Prior to joining JER, Mr. Ratinoff served as Principal with Fowler Flanagan Partners, where he either led or participated in the acquisition, financing and renovation of approximately 3,000 apartment units in California, Seattle, Arizona, Texas and Missouri. Mr. Ratinoff also held senior positions focusing on real estate investment banking with McDonald Investments, Chase Securities and BT Alex. Brown, executing public and private capital markets transactions for west coast-based real estate companies. Mr. Ratinoff received a BA in Architecture and City Planning from the University of California, Berkeley, and an MBA from the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University. Mr. Ratinoff has not held any other prior public company directorship within the last five years.

Gordon L. Witter, Jr. Mr. Witter, age 75, has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company since July 1999 and is Chairman of the Company’s Compensation Committee.

Mr. Witter brings extensive knowledge and experience regarding the Company’s businesses gained from his many years of service on the Company’s Board. Mr. Witter is a retired Chief Pilot for American Airlines. He later formed Witter Associates, a multi-disciplined flight operations consulting firm and in 1997 co-founded Air Carrier Associates, Inc., a firm specializing in risk management issues for airline and general aviation clients. He is retained by a major defense manufacturer as a consultant in areas of civil certification and marketing and is an active provider of technical expertise for aviation law firms. Mr. Witter serves as a Director of Sharp Healthcare and Chairman of its Audit and Corporate Compliance Committee. He is also Chairman of the Board of Sharp Healthcare Foundation and Chairman Emeritus of the San Diego Air and Space Museum.

Current Directors - Term expires in 2010, not running for re-election

Thomas J. Pancheri. Mr. Pancheri, age 50, elected not to stand for re-election as a director and therefore, was not nominated by the Board of Directors. Mr. Pancheri served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company since July 1999.

Mr. Pancheri is the Chief Executive Officer of San Diego Pension Consultants, Inc., founded in July of 1981 which specializes in design and administration of all types of retirement plans. Mr. Pancheri was the Charter President of the San Diego chapter of the National Institute of Pension Administrators. He has been a member of the Western Pension & Benefits Conference. San Diego Pension Consultants, Inc. is the main division of Pen/Flex, Inc. which services roughly 1,500 qualified plans, primarily in the San Diego area. The other division is Complete Pension Services, which handles approximately 330 Plans in the Los Angeles and Orange counties.

Current Directors - Terms expire after 20102014

Theodore C. Allrich. Mr. Allrich, age 64,65, has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company since October 2009 and served as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors since 1999 and as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company since 1999.and the Bank. Mr. Allrich also serves in the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company and as Chairman of the Asset and Liability Committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank (“ALCO Committee”).

Mr. Allrich has extensive knowledge of the financial services industry as the founder ofThe Online Investor (<http://www.theonlineinvestor.com>), a financial educational website based on his book of the same name. He has served as an investment advisor with his own firm, Allrich Investment Management, from June 1991 to June 2003. Prior to starting his own firm, Mr. Allrich spent 20 years with various Wall Street brokerage firms, where he was involved with investment banking, fixed income sales and management, specializing in mortgage-backed securities, institutional equity sales and trading. His last position with a brokerage firm was in 1990 as the regional manager for high grade fixed income investments with Drexel Burnham Lambert in San Francisco. Mr. Allrich holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of California at Davis and a Master of Business Administration degree in Finance from Stanford University.

John Gary Burke. Mr. Burke, age 65,66, has served as a member of the Board of Directors since October 2005 and is a member of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company since October 2005.and the Chairman of the Internal Assets Review Committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank (“IAR Committee”).

Mr. Burke brings extensive leadership and business management as President and sole shareholder of Truck World, Inc., a wholesale and retail petroleum marketing company, based in the Youngstown, Ohio area. Truck World, Inc. is a retail jobber for Shell Oil and Marathon Ashland Petroleum. Since founding the company in 1972, heMr. Burke has built, developed, opened and operated convenience stores and truck stops. Additionally, in 1980, Mr. Burke acquired and operated four pipeline terminals on the Buckeye Pipeline System and became involved with various aspects of distribution, including scheduling, trading and hedging. Mr. Burke served as a Directordirector of the Ohio Petroleum Marketing Association for nine years during this time. Mr. Burke is also President and sole shareholder of J. Gary Burke Corporation, a real estate holding company that owns and manages properties in various states. Most recently, J. Gary Burke Corporation processed the entitlements and developed the site improvements for a 40-acre industrial park in Otay Mesa, California. Before serving in the United States Navy as a Naval Aviator from 1968 to 1971, Mr. Burke earned his BSME degree from the University of Miami, Florida.

Nicholas A. Mosich.Mosich. Mr. Mosich, age 55,56, has served as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors since October 2010 and as a member of the Board of Directors since May 2009. Mr. Mosich also serves as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company since May 2009.and the Bank and as a member of the Credit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank.

Mr. Mosich has extensive knowledge of the real estate and investment banking industry acquired through his career as a Managing Member of Ion Capital Partners, LLC., and a general partner of Ion California Land Fund, LP, a discretionary investment fund that is acquiring distressed residential development projects in California. Mr. Mosich brings 2627 years of capital markets and business management experience, most recently as an Executive Vice President, Executive Committee Member and Membermember of the Board of Directors of The Seidler Companies Incorporated, a NYSE member firm.firm (“Seidler”). While at Seidler, Mr. Mosich was responsible for its Orange County Office, overseeing its Private Client Service operations and Investment Banking Operations. He was also a producing Managing Director of itsSeidler’s Community Bank Group. While at Seidler, he wasGroup active in mergers and acquisitions, raising public and private capital for emerging growth companies and for raising capital for banks including an active role as a co-manager of BofI Holding, Inc.’sthe Company’s IPO. In January of 2001, he merged his predecessor firm, Hagerty Stewart & Associates, Inc., into Seidler. Previously, Mr. Mosich was a partner at McGoodwin James & Company, a venture capital firm headquartered in Costa Mesa, where he was active in funding later stage venture companies and structuring private investments in public companies. Mr. Mosich completed his undergraduate degree (cum laude) at the University of Michigan and received his M.B.AMBA from Stanford University.

Current Directors – Terms expire after 2011

James S. Argalas. Mr. Argalas age 40, has served as a member of the Board of Directors since August 2011 and serves as a member of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank and as a member of the IAR Committee. Mr. Argalas is a Class III director whose term expires at the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders.

Mr. Argalas has extensive experience in the financial and investment sectors. In 2006, he founded Presidio Union, LLC, a company that specializes in providing financial analysis and corporate advisory services to early stage growth companies and their investors, taking an active role in developing ventures that have the potential to create significant shareholder value. Prior to founding Presidio Union, Mr. Argalas was a Principal at Watershed Asset Management and NM Rothschild, where he was responsible for investments in distressed credit, liquidations, real estate, special situations, and debt and equity investments in Asia-Pacific. Prior to joining Watershed, Mr. Argalas was an Associate Principal with McKinsey & Company and an Associate at Goldman Sachs. Mr. Argalas has a Master of Business Administration from Kellogg Graduate School of Management (Northwestern University) with majors in Finance, Entrepreneurship and International Business; in addition Mr. Argalas earned a Bachelor of Science in Engineering from the University of Michigan, and a Bachelor of Science in Foreign Service from Georgetown University.

James J. Court. Mr. Court, age 49, has served as a member of the Board of Directors since April 2011. Mr. Court was appointed to fill the vacancy left by Gordon L. Witter, Jr., who passed away on January 14, 2011. Mr. Court is a Class III director whose term expires at the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders.

Mr. Court’s prior experience, qualifications and attributes include his current position as Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of First American’s Property & Casualty Insurance Group (“First American”), an organization with which he has been affiliated since 1999. Mr. Court’s responsibilities at First American encompass the group’s operations and information technology. Prior to joining First American, Mr. Court held information technology and operations positions at MGE UPS Systems and Printronix, Inc. Further, Mr. Court has led successful business and technology transformations in both the financial services and manufacturing sectors. Mr. Court holds an MBA from the Graziadio School of Business and Management at Pepperdine University, a Bachelor of Science Degree in Information Systems from the University of Redlands, and an Associate Degree in Electronic Engineering Technology.

Jerry F. Englert.Englert. Mr. Englert, age 69,70, has served as a member of the Board of Directors since July 1999 and served as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company sincefrom October 2009. Mr. Englert served2009 to October 2010 and as Chairman of the Board of Directors from July 1999 to October 2009 and2009. Mr. Englert also served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from July 1999 to October 2004. Mr. Englert serves as Chairman of the Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company and as a member of the IAR Committee. Mr. Englert is a Class II director whose term expires at the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders.

Mr. Englert brings leadership and capital raising expertise as a founder of Bank of Del Mar and as its Vice Chairman from 1989 to 1994. Mr. Englert served as the President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Winfield Industries from 1972 until it was sold to Maxxim Medical in 1991. From 1968 to 1972, heMr. Englert was Vice President of Marketing for IVAC Corporation and from 1963 to 1968;1968, he was a Regional Sales Manager for Baxter Health Care, Inc. Mr. Englert holds a Bachelor of Arts degree from Morris Harvey College. In addition, Mr. Englert received an honorary Ph.D. from the University of Charleston.

Gregory Garrabrants.Garrabrants. Mr. Garrabrants, age 38,39, has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since October 2007 and as a directormember of the CompanyBoard of Directors since March 1, 2008.2008 and as a member of the Credit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank. He is a Class II director whose term expires at the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders.

Mr. Garrabrants has extensive knowledge of the financial services industry, as wells as leadership and business management with more than 1213 years of experience in financial services. Mr. Garrabrants began his career at Deloitte & Touche, LLP. Thereafter, Mr. Garrabrants worked at McKinsey & Company. While at McKinsey, Garrabrants advised top management of financial institutions on strategy development, marketing and sales force effectiveness, and acquisition and joint venture opportunities. After McKinsey, Mr. Garrabrants worked for Goldman Sachs as an investment banker from 2004 to 2006. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Garrabrants lead the business development group responsible for merger and acquisitions, joint ventures, and strategic alliances at what was then the nation’s seventh largest thrift from 2006 to 2007. Mr. Garrabrants earned his degree of Juris Doctorate degree Magna Cum Laude,, and his M.B.A.,MBA, with highest distinction, from Northwestern University, and he earned a Bachelor of Science in Engineering from the University of Southern California. Mr. Garrabrants is a Chartered Financial Analyst.

Paul Grinberg. Mr. Grinberg, age 49,50, has served as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company since April 2004 and isserves as Chairman of the Company’sCompensation Committee of the Board of the Directors of the Company and as Chairman of the Audit Committee.Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank. Mr. Grinberg is a Class II director whose term expires at the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders.

Mr. Grinberg brings extensive accounting and financial reporting expertise as the Executive Vice President, CFO and Treasurer of Encore Capital Group, Inc., (NASDAQ: ECPG), a purchaser of charged-off, unsecured consumer loans, where he has been employed since September 2004. From May 2003 to January 2005, Mr. Grinberg served as the President and CEO of Brio Consulting Group, Inc., a consulting firm that he founded that provided financial strategy and analysis to private-equity and venture-backed companies. From 1997 to 2003, he held the CFO position for private and public companies, including Stellcom, Inc. and TeleSpectrum Worldwide Inc. (NASDAQ: TLSP), both located in San Diego. He was also a partner and senior member in the Merger and Acquisition Services Group of Deloitte & Touche in New York. Mr. Grinberg’s strengths have been in accounting, SEC reporting, raising capital, financial strategy, providing leadership in investor relations, and M&A activities. Mr. Grinberg has extensive experience with high-growth situations, venture/private equity backed companies and public companies. a company he founded that provided financial consulting services, primarily to small and mid-size private equity and venture-backed companies. Mr. Grinberg is a CPA in the state of New York and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from Yeshiva University and a Masters of Business Administration degree in Finance from Columbia University’s Graduate School of Business.

Edward J. Ratinoff.Mr. Ratinoff, age 46, has served as a member of the Board of Directors since April 2010 and serves as Chairman of the Credit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank. Mr. Ratinoff is a Class III director whose term expires at the 2013 annual meeting of shareholders.

Mr. Ratinoff’s prior experience, qualifications and attributes include being a Managing Director and Head of Acquisitions for Phoenix Realty Group, an institutional real estate investment firm focused on opportunistic multifamily investments. Mr. Ratinoff oversees the investment program for two fund vehicles totaling approximately $400 million in equity, directs acquisition teams in Los Angeles and New York, and is a member of the firm’s investment committee. Prior to recently joining Phoenix Realty Group, Mr. Ratinoff held the position of Managing Director and west coast head for the J.E. Robert Companies. In this role, Mr. Ratinoff was responsible for all equity and debt transactions throughout the western US for the real estate investment funds sponsored by the firm and was a member of the investment committees for both JER Partners and JER Investors Trust (NYSE: JRT). Mr. Ratinoff was also responsible for directing JER’s multifamily investment strategy in the US, acquiring 2,300 apartment units in Seattle, Atlanta and Detroit. During his tenure Mr. Ratinoff led the acquisition of approximately $1.0 billion in assets representing multiple real estate sectors and geographies. Prior to joining JER, Mr. Ratinoff served as Principal with Fowler Flanagan Partners, where he either led or participated in the acquisition, financing and renovation of approximately 3,000 apartment units in California, Seattle, Arizona, Texas and Missouri. Mr. Ratinoff also held senior positions focusing on real estate investment banking with McDonald Investments,

Chase Securities and BT Alex. Brown, executing public and private capital markets transactions for west coast-based real estate companies. Mr. Ratinoff received a BA in Architecture and City Planning from the University of California, Berkeley, and an MBA from the J.L. Kellogg Graduate School of Management at Northwestern University. Mr. Ratinoff has served as a member of the board of directors of MPG Office Trust, Inc., since February 2011.

There are no family relationships among any of the officers or directors.

Resignation of Vice Chairman and Election of New Vice Chairman October 2010

On August 26, 2010, Mr. Englert, the Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, announced his resignation as Vice Chairman effective October 22, 2010. Mr. Englert will remain a director of the Company. Also, on August 26, 2010, the Board elected Mr. Mosich to serve as Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company effective October 22, 2010.

Corporate GovernanceCORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Role of the Board of Directors

In accordance with our Bylaws and Delaware law, the Board of Directors oversees the management of the business and affairs of the Company. The members of the Board also are the members of the Board of Directors of the Bank, which accounts for substantially all of the Company’s consolidated operating results. The members of the Board keep informed about our business through discussions with senior management and other officers and managers of the Company and its subsidiaries, including the Bank, by reviewing analyses and reports sentsubmitted to them by management and outside consultants, and by participating in Board and in Board committee meetings.

Board of Directors Composition and Independence

Our Board of Directors is authorized to have up to ten members and nine members are currently serving on the Board.Board of Directors. In accordance with the terms of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, our Board of Directors wasis divided into three classes, Class I, Class II and Class III, with each class serving staggered three-year terms. The members of the classes are divided as follows:

 

The Class I directors are Messrs. Allrich, Burke and Mosich and their terms will expire at the 2011 annual meeting of stockholders;shareholders;

 

The Class II directors are Messrs. Englert, Garrabrants and Grinberg and their terms will expire at the 2012 annual meeting of stockholders;shareholders; and

 

The Class III directors are Messrs. Pancheri,Argalas, Court and Ratinoff and Witter and their terms will expire at the 20102013 annual meeting of stockholders.shareholders.

The authorized number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the Board of Directors. Any additional directorships resulting from an increase in the number of directors will be distributed among the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each class will consist of one third of the directors. This classification of our Board of Directors may have the effect of delaying or preventing changes in our control or management. Our directors will hold office until their successors have been elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation, disqualification or removal for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our outstanding stock entitled to vote on election of directors.

The Board has determined that eight members of the Board are independent undermeet the definition of independence set forth in NASDAQ’s listed company“independent director” as the term is defined by applicable NASDAQ rules. Mr. Garrabrants is not an independent director because he is our President and Chief Executive Officer. In reaching these conclusions, the Board considered all relevant facts and circumstances with respect to any direct or indirect relationships between the Company and each of the non-management directors. The Board determined that any relationships that now exist, or that have existed in the past, between the Company and any of the non-management directors have no material effect on their independence.

All of the members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Compensation CommitteesNominating Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company are independent directors.

Board Leadership Structure

Currently, Mr. Garrabrants serves as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, while Mr. Allrich, who is an independent director, serves as the Chairman of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors believes that this leadership structure best serves the Company at this time because it allows Mr. Garrabrants to focus on the Company’s operations and strategy, while Mr. Allrich, among other things, can provide independent leadership for the Board of Directors, set the agenda for meetings, and enable other directors to raise issues and concerns for board consideration by the Board of Directors without immediately involving the President and Chief Executive Officer or other management.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors, together with the Audit Committee, the Nominating, and the Compensation Committee as well as two Risk Committees,three risk committees, which are the Credit Committee, Internal Asset Review (IAR) and the Asset and Liability Committees (ALCO), coordinate with each other to provide enterprise-wide oversight of our management and handling of risk. These committees report regularly to the full Board of Directors on risk-related matters and provide the Board of Directors with insight about our management of strategic, credit, interest rate, financial reporting, technology, liquidity, compliance, operational and reputational risks. In addition, at meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees, directors receive regular updates and reports from management regarding risk management practices, including credit quality, financial reporting, internal controls, compliance, legal matters, asset liability and liquidity management, among others. Furthermore, current risk management issues are discussed regularly with the Board of Directors and its committees.

Our Board is actively involved in oversight and review of the Company’s risk management efforts either directly or through its standing committees. The Company’s management is responsible for assessing and managing risk and communicating risks to the Board. In fiscal 2011, the Company’s management implemented an Enterprise Risk Management (“ERM”) program, led by certain officers of the Company, including Mr. Garrabrants, our President and Chief Executive Officer, with oversight from the Board. The ERM program was established to identify and evaluate key business risks within the financial, operational, regulatory and strategic arenas and to develop risk monitoring processes and response strategies to transfer, avoid, reduce or accept individual risks as appropriate. The ERM program assists management in determining appropriate risk tolerance levels which balance risk mitigation with opportunities to create stockholder value. ERM program leaders make regular reports to the Board regarding the ERM program’s risk identification, management and mitigation strategy recommendations.

While the Board has retained the responsibility for general oversight of risks and of our ERM program, the Board’s standing committees support the Board by regularly addressing various risks in their respective areas of oversight. Specifically, the Audit Committee primarily oversees those risks that may directly or indirectly impact our financial statements, including the areas of financial reporting, internal controls and compliance with public reporting requirements, while the Compensation Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its risk management oversight responsibilities associated with risks arising from employee compensation policies and practices. Each standing committee provides reports to the full Board at regular meetings concerning the activities of the committee and actions take by the committee since the last regular meeting.

Corporate Governance Principles

Our Directorsdirectors are committed to having sound corporate governance principles that assist them in fulfilling their oversight duties. These principles are essential to maintaining the Company’s integrity in the marketplace. In January 2005, our Board of Directors formally adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines of BofI Holding, Inc. (the “Governance Guidelines”), which include a number of the practices and policies under which our Board has operated for some time, together with concepts suggested by various authorities in corporate governance and the new requirements under the NASDAQ’s listed company rules and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Some of the principal subjects covered by our Governance Guidelines include:

 

  

Director Qualifications, which addresses a Board candidate’s independence, experience, knowledge, skills, expertise, integrity, ability to make independent analytical inquiries; his or her understanding of our business and the business environment in which we operate; and the candidate’s ability and willingness to devote adequate time and effort to Board responsibilities, taking into account the candidate’s employment and other board commitments.

 

  

Responsibilities of Directors, including acting in the best interests of all shareholders; maintaining independence; developing and maintaining a sound understanding of our business and the industry in which we operate; preparing for and attending Board and Board committee meetings; and providing active, objective and constructive participation at those meetings.

 

  

Director Access to Management and, as necessary and appropriate, Independent Advisors, including encouraging presentations to the Board from the officers responsible for functional areas of our business.

 

  

Regularly Scheduled Executive Sessions of the Board, without Management. Our Governance Guidelines also provide for the Audit Committee to meet with the Company’s outside auditors separately from management.

Board Meetings and Attendance

Our Board members are encouraged to prepare for and attend all Board of Director and shareholder meetings and the meetings of the Board committees on which they are members. During the 20102011 fiscal year, the BoardsBoard of Directors of the Company and the Bank held a total of 1112 meetings and 1113 meetings, respectively. All but one of our directors attended at least 80more than 75 percent of the total of those meetings and the meetings of the Board committees on which they served. All of our directors attended our Annual Meeting of Shareholders held in October 2009.

2010.

Code of Business Conduct

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct for our directors, officers and employees and a specific Code of Ethics that applies to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Code of Ethics can be found at the Corporate Governance section of our website atwww.bofiholding.com. We intend to disclose, at this location on our website, any amendments to that Code and any waivers of the requirements of that Code that may be granted to our Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer.

Other Governance Matters

In addition to the governance initiatives discussed above, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have certified our SEC filings as required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 each quarter since the certification rules became applicable to us. We also have adopted charters for our Board committees in compliance with NASDAQ listed company rules.

You can access our Board committee charters, and other corporate governance materials, news releases and SEC filings, by visiting the Investor Relations section of our website atwww.bofiholding.com.

Committees of the Board of DirectorsCOMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors of the Company has three standing committees: Audit, Compensation and Nominating. The members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company also serve as members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank and together are referred to herein as the “Audit Committee.” A description of the general functions of the Committees, the composition of each of those Committees and the number of meetings held by those Committees for the 20102011 fiscal year are set forth below.

Audit Committee. The current members of the Audit Committee are Paul Grinberg, its Chairman, Thomas J. Pancheri,Nicholas A. Mosich and James S. Argalas. Gordon L. Witter, Jr., and Nicholas A. Mosich.served as a member of the Committee until his passing on January 14, 2011, at which point Theodore C. Allrich served as a member of the Audit Committee until James S. Argales commenced his service in the Audit Committee. All of the members of the Audit Committee are independent directors within the meaning of the NASDAQ listed company rules and meet the enhanced independence requirements for audit committee members contained in Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Grinberg meets the definitions of “audit committee financial expert” adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and included in NASDAQ’s rules for listed companies. The Audit Committee has a written charter that specifies its responsibilities, which include oversight of the financial reporting process and system of internal accounting controls of the Company, and appointment and oversight of the independent public accountants engaged to audit the Company’s financial statements. Our Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Audit Committee, approved that charter. A copy of thatour Audit Committee Charter, which complies with applicable NASDAQ rules, is accessible at the Investor Relations section of our website atwww.bofiholding.com. TheDuring fiscal year 2011, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company held sevenfive (5) meetings during fiscal 2010.and the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Bank held thirteen (13) meetings. The Audit Committee also meets with our outside auditors and members of management, separately.

Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee is comprised of the following directors, all of whom are independent (as defined in the applicable NASDAQ listed company rules): Paul Grinberg, its Chair, John Gary Burke and Theodore C. Allrich. Mr. Allrich was appointed to the Compensation Committed on January 20, 2011, due to the vacancy left by the passing of Gordon L. Witter Jr., who serves as on January 14, 2011. The Compensation Committee assists the Committee’s Chairman, John Gary Burke, Paul GrinbergBoard in discharging its responsibilities relating to compensation of the Company’s directors and Thomas J. Pancheri.executive officers. The Compensation Committee reviews and approves the salaries and establishes incentive compensation and other benefit plans for our executive officers.plans. Our Board of Directors has approved a charter setting forth the role and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee. A copy of that charter, which complies with applicable NASDAQ rules, is accessible at the Investor Relations section of our website atwww.bofiholding.com. The Compensation Committee held foursix (6) meetings during fiscal 2010.2011.

Nominating Committee. The members of the Nominating Committee are Jerry F. Englert, its Chairman,Chair, and Paul Grinberg and Gordon L. Witter, Jr.Grinberg. The Committee will identifyassists the Board in selecting nominees for election to the Board, in assessing the performance of the Board and screen new candidates for Board membership.in monitoring the composition of the Board. Each member of the Nominating Committee is anmeets the “independent director” requirements within the meaning of the NASDAQ listed company rules. The Board has adopted a charter setting forth the responsibilities of the Nominating Committee. A copy of that charter, which complies with applicable NASDAQ rules, is accessible at the Investor Relations section of our website atwww.bofiholding.com. The Committee met twicesix (6) times during fiscal 2010 in its role as Nominating Committee.2011.

The Director Nominating Process. In identifying new Board candidates, the Nominating Committee will seekseeks recommendations from existing board members and executive officers. The Committee also has the authority to engage an executive search firm and other advisors, as it deems appropriate, to assist it identifying qualified candidates for the Board.

In considering potential new directors and officers, the Committee will reviewreviews individuals from various disciplines and backgrounds. Among the qualifications to be considered in the selection of candidates areare: broad experience in business, finance or administration; familiarity with national and international business matters; familiarity with the Company’s industry; and prominence and reputation. Since prominence and reputation in a particular profession or field of endeavor are what bring most persons to the Committee’s attention of the Nominating Committee, there is the further consideration of whether the individual has the time available to devote to the workfunctions and responsibilities of the Board and one or more of its committees.

AThe Nominating Committee conducts a comprehensive review is made of the activities and associations of each candidate to ensure that there isare no legal impediment,impediments, conflict of interestinterests or other considerationconsiderations that might hinder or prevent service on the Board. In making its selection, the Nominating Committee will bearbears in mind that the foremost responsibility of a director of a Company is to represent the interests of the stockholders as a whole.

PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF COMMON STOCK

ThisThe following table shows information regarding beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock by the only entities known by us to have owned more than 5% of the 10,201,26310,420,808 outstanding shares of our common stock on September 1, 2010.the record date. Included in the shares beneficially owned are (i) shares that could be purchased under stock options granted to directors as of September 1, 2010August 26, 2011 and exercisable within 60 days after September 1, 2010;the record date; and (ii) restricted stock units that vest within 60 days after September 1, 2010.the record date.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Shares of Common
Stock Beneficially
Owned
  Percent of
Shares
Outstanding
 

Michael A. Chipman1

  809,527  7.94

Jerry F. Englert2

  648,150  6.33

Scott L. Barbee3

  570,313  5.59

John Gary Burke4

  513,459  5.03

Name of Beneficial Owner

  Shares of Common
Stock Beneficially
Owned
   Percent of
Shares
Outstanding
 

Wellington Management Co, LLC1

   964,536     9.26

Michael A. Chipman2

   809,527     7.77

Jerry F. Englert3

   640,518     6.12

Shaker Investments, LLC4

   598,516     5.74

 

(1)1

Based on Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2011.

2

Based on a review of the Schedule 13G filed by The Chipman First Family Limited Partnership and Michael and Evelyn Chipman with the SEC on February 13, 2009. Mr. Chipman is a former director and holds his common stock in The Chipman First Family Limited Partnership. Chipent, LLC is the general partner of The Chipman First Family Limited Partnership and Michael and Evelyn Chipman are sole members and sole managers of Chipent, LLC. The sole limited partner of the holder is M&E Chipman Living Trust 9/28/95, of which Michael and Evelyn Chipman are the sole trustees and the settlers which hassettlors who have sole voting and dispositive power with respect to the 809,527 shares.

(2)3

Mr. Englert is a director and holds his common stock in The Englert Family Trust. The amount set forth includes exercisable options to purchase 38,46331,820 shares of the Company’s common stock.

(3)4

Based solely on a review of the Schedule 13G filed by Scott L. Barbee and Aegis Financial Corporation with the SEC on February 12, 2010. The address for Aegis Financial Corporation is 1100 North Glebe Road, Suite 1040, Arlington, VA 22201. As reported on the Schedule 13G, Mr. Barbee is an individual who has sole voting and dispositive power with respect to 570,313 shares.

(4)Mr. Burke is a director and his ownership excludes 12,000 shares held by his children for which Mr. Burke does not have voting or dispositive power over these shares. The amount set forth includes exercisable options to purchase 12,900 shares of the Company’s common stock.January 26, 2011.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Set forth below is certain information, as of September 1, 2010the record date regarding the shares of the Company’s common stock that were owned, beneficially, by (i) each director, (ii) each of the current executive officers of the Company who are named in the Summary Compensation Table (the “Named Officers”Executives”), and (iii) all of the current directors and executive officers as a group. Included in the common stock column below are restricted stock units that vest within 60 days after September 1, 2010.the record date. Included in the shares beneficially owned are shares that could be purchased under stock options granted to directors and officers as of September 1, 2010the record date and exercisable within 60 days after September 1, 2010.the record date. The percent of outstanding shares of our common stock is based upon outstanding shares at September 1, 2010.the record date. Except as indicated in the footnotes to the table below, each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares he or she beneficially owns.

 

Name

  Common
Stock1
  Options
Exercisable2
  Total
Beneficial
Ownership
  Percent of
Outstanding
Shares
 

Jerry F. Englert3

  609,687  38,463  648,150  6.33

John Gary Burke4

  500,559  12,900  513,459  5.03

Thomas J. Pancheri5

  151,074  23,668  174,742  1.71

Andrew J. Micheletti6

  16,557  128,750  145,307  1.41

Gregory Garrabrants7

  52,031  —    52,031  *  

Theodore Allrich8

  52,679  39,825  92,504  *  

Gordon L. Witter, Jr.9

  63,195  23,668  86,863  *  

Paul Grinberg10

  20,310  23,800  44,110  *  

Nicholas Mosich11

  9,659  —    9,659  *  

James Thomas12

  963  —    963  *  

Craig Cross13

  409  —    409  *  

All current directors and executive officers as a group (11 persons)

  1,477,123  291,074  1,768,197  16.81

Name

  Common
Stock1
   Options
Exercisable2
   Total
Beneficial
Ownership
   Percent of
Outstanding
Shares
 

Jerry F. Englert3

   608,698     31,820     640,518     6.12

John Gary Burke4

   485,359     12,900     498,259     4.77

Gregory Garrabrants5

   143,946     —       143,946     1.35

Andrew J. Micheletti6

   38,903     102,500     141,403     1.34

Theodore C. Allrich7

   59,322     38,117     97,439     *  

Paul Grinberg8

   28,430     23,800     52,230     *  

Nicholas A. Mosich9

   13,771     —       13,771     *  

Edward J. Ratinoff10

   1,784     —       1,784     *  

Thomas Constantine11

   936     —       936     *  

Adriaan van Zyl12

   151     —       151     *  

Brian Swanson13

   59     —       59     *  

James J. Court14

   —       —       —       *  

James S. Argalas15

   —       —       —       *  

All current directors and executive officers as a group (13 persons)

   1,381,359     209,137     1,590,496     14.43

 

*Less than one percent.
(1)1

All fractional shares have been rounded to the closest whole share.

(2)2

In accordance with applicable SEC rules, only options that are exercisable within 60 days after September 1, 2010.the record date are included in this column.

(3)3

Mr. Englert is a director and holds his common stock in The Englert Family Trust.

(4)4

Mr. Burke is a director and his ownership excludes 12,000 shares held by his children forover which Mr. Burke does not have voting or dispositive power over these shares.power.

(5)5

Mr. Pancheri is a director and holds 108,799 shares, 7,875 shares and 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in The Thomas J. Pancheri Separate Property Trust, Pancheri Enterprises and TJP Enterprises, Inc., respectively. Mr. Pancheri is the sole trustee of The Thomas J. Pancheri Separate Property Trust, the sole general partner of Pancheri Enterprises and the chief executive officer and sole director of TJP Enterprises, Inc. In addition, 21,000 shares are held in the names of Mr. Pancheri’s children.

(6)

Mr. Micheletti is the chief financial officer.

(7)

Mr. Garrabrants is the president, chief executive officerPresident, Chief Executive Officer and a director. CommonHis ownership of common stock set forth above does not include 41,50020,750 restricted stock units that have vested, but the receipt of which were deferred receipt.deferred.

(8)6

Mr. Micheletti is the Chief Financial Officer.

7

Mr. Allrich is a director.

(9)8

Mr. WitterGrinberg is a director.director

(10)9

Mr. GrinbergMosich is a director. Common stock above does not include 3,066 restricted stock units, that have vested, but were deferred receipt.

(11)10

Mr. MosichRatinoff is a director.

(12)11

Mr. ThomasConstantine is a named officer.Named Executive.

(13)12

Mr. Crossvan Zyl is a named officer.Named Executive.

13

Mr. Swanson is a Named Executive.

14

Mr. Court is a director.

15

Mr. Argalas is a director.

Compensation of Non-Employee DirectorsCOMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

The Company’s Board of Directors of the Company, acting upon a recommendation from the Compensation Committee, annually determines the compensation of the non-employee directors’ compensationdirectors for serving ontheir service in the Board and its committees. In establishing director compensation, the Board and the Compensation Committee are guided by the following goals:

 

Compensation should consist of a combination of cash and equity awards that are designed to fairly pay the directors for work required for a company of our size and scope;

 

Compensation should align the directors’ interests with the long-term interests of shareholders; and

 

Compensation should assist with attracting and retaining qualified directors.

The Company does not pay director compensation to directors who are also our employees. Below are the elements of compensation paid to non-employee directors for their service on our Board:

Cash Compensation

Company non-employee directors receivedreceive the following annual cash payments for their service onin our Board of Directors and Board committees during fiscal 2010:committees:

 

   Amount

Annual cash retainer

  $30,000

Chairman fee1

   50,000

Chairman audit committee fee

   20,000

Vice-chairman fee

   10,000

Chairman compensation committee fee

   10,000
   Amount1 

Chairman

  $88,000  

Vice-chairman

   55,000  

Chairman of the audit committee

   55,000  

Chairman of the compensation committee

   44,000  

Other directors

   33,000  

 

(1)1Effective October 22, 2009 the annual Chairman fee increased from $25,000 to $50,000.

Amounts listed reflect a 10% increase effective March 1, 2011.

TheDuring fiscal 2011, the Company did not provide perquisites to any director in an amount that is reportable under applicable SEC rules and regulations. The Company directly pays or reimburses allAll non-employee directors are entitled to reimbursement for parking, travel and accommodation expenses incurred in connection with attendance at Board and committee meetings.

Equity Compensation

Each non-employee director is eligible for an annual grant of options and restricted stock issued from our 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, as recommended by our Compensation Committee. The amounts of the annual non-employee director awards are discretionary from year-to-year. The options and restricted stock that the Company awards to our directors vests over three years, one-third each anniversary of the date of grant.

Company non-employee directors will receive each year the following grant of restricted stock units for their service on our Board of Directors and Board committees:

 

   Amount1

Director

 3,600

Chairman

  10,000

Chairman audit committee

11,000
  4,600

Vice-chairman

  4,6005,100

Chairman of the audit committee

5,100

Chairman of the compensation committee

  4,400

Other directors

4,000

1

Amounts listed reflect an approximate 10% increase effective March 1, 2011.

2

The current chairmen of the audit committee also is chairman of the compensation committee receiving 5,500 shares annually for both.

On August 26, 2010,10, 2011, the Board of Directors of BofI Holding, Inc.the Company granted the above amounts of restricted stock units to the non-employee directors for a total of 35,20037,600 restricted stock units. The restricted stock units have a value of $11.28$12.46 per share, which was the closing price on the grant date of August 26, 2010,10, 2011, and vest over three years, one-third on each anniversary date of the grant. Mr. Ratinoff onlyArgalas received a grant of 1,2007,588 restricted stock units ason August 18, 2011 when he joined the board during the fiscal year.board.

Deferred Compensation

Company directors are also eligible to participate in the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan, which allows eligible directors to defer their fees and retainers payable for their service on the Board and Board committees.

In accordance with applicable SEC rules and regulations, the following table reports all compensation the Company paid to non-employee directors during fiscal 2010:2011:

Director Compensation in Fiscal 20102011

 

Name

  Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash ($)1
  Stock
Awards ($)2
  Option
Awards ($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation

($)
  Changes
in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)3
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)
  Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash ($)1
   Stock
Awards  ($)2
   Option
Awards ($)
   Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
   Changes
in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
   All Other
Compensation
($)
   Total
($)
 

Theodore Allrich

  66,667  37,490  —    —    —    —    104,157

Theodore C. Allrich

   82,667     112,800     —       —       —       —       195,467  

John Gary Burke

  30,000  29,340  —    —    —    —    59,340   31,000     40,608     —       —       —       —       71,608  

James J. Court3

   8,250     100,012     —       —       —       —       108,262  

Jerry F. Englert

  45,000  40,750  —    —    —    —    85,750   34,333     51,888     —       —       —       —       86,221  

Paul Grinberg

  50,000  37,490  —    —    —    —    87,490   51,667     51,888     —       —       —       —       103,555  

Nicholas A. Mosich

  30,000  —    —    —    —    —    30,000   41,667     40,608     —       —       —       —       82,275  

Thomas J. Pancheri

  30,000  29,340  —    —    —    —    59,340

Thomas Pancheri4

   50,000     —       —       —       —       —       50,000  

C. Michelle Paulus4

  30,000  29,340  —    —    —    —    59,340

Edward J. Ratinoff

   31,000     13,536     —       —       —       —       44,536  

Edward J. Ratinoff5

  5,000  100,012  —    —    —    —    105,012

Gordon L. Witter, Jr.

  40,000  32,600  —    —    —    —    72,600

Gordon L. Witter, Jr.5

   26,667     45,120     —       —       —       —       71,787  

 

(1)1

The amounts in this column represent the annual cash fees paid to our non-employee directors for service during fiscal 2010.2011.

(2)2

The stock awards included for each director above consists of Restricted Stock Units. The value for each of these awards is its grant date fair value calculated by multiplying the number of units subject to the award by the NASDAQ closing price per share on the date such award was granted. The table below shows the award number of shares, the grant date, the per shareper-share fair value, and the total grant date fair value for the stock awards shown.

(3)3

The amounts reported in this column consistedMr. Court joined the Board effective as of above-market interest paid pursuant to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan. In accordance with applicable SEC regulations, the reported above-market interest consists of earnings in the interest method of accrual in our Deferred Compensation Plan to the extent that the interest rate exceeded 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate.April 21, 2011.

(4)4

Ms. PaulusMr. Pancheri resigned from the Board effective October 21, 2010 and his stock award for fiscal 2011 was a director for all of the 2010 fiscal year but resigned June 2010.cancelled.

(5)5

Mr. Ratinoff joined the Board effective April 12, 2010.Witter passed away on January 14, 2011.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20102011

The table below shows all plan-based awards that the Company made to the directors during fiscal 2010 to the Directors.2011:

 

Name and Principal Position

  Year  Grant
Date
  Non-equity
Incentive Plan ($)
  Restricted 
Stock
Awards
  Option
Awards:
Number of
Shares
Underlying
Option
  Exercise
or Base
Price
of
Option
Awards
($/per
Share)
  Grant Date
Fair Value of
Option
Awards ($)
  Year   Grant
Date
   Non-equity
Incentive  Plan ($)
   Restricted
Stock
Awards
   Option
Awards:
Number of
Shares
Underlying
Option
   Exercise
or Base
Price
of
Option
Awards
($/per
Share)
   Grant Date
Fair Value of
Option
Awards ($)
 

Theodore Allrich

  2010  9/24/09  —    4,600  —    8.15  $37,490

Theodore C. Allrich

   2011     8/26/10     —       10,000     —       11.28    $112,800  

John Gary Burke

  2010  9/24/09  —    3,600  —    8.15   29,340   2011     8/26/10     —       3,600     —       11.28     40,608  

James J. Court

   2011     4/21/11     —       6,411     —       15.60     100,012  

Jerry F. Englert

  2010  9/24/09  —    5,000  —    8.15   40,750   2011     8/26/10     —       4,600     —       11.28     51,888  

Paul Grinberg

  2010  9/24/09  —    4,600  —    8.15   37,490   2011     8/26/10     —       4,600     —       11.28     51,888  

Nicholas A. Mosich

  2010  —    —    —    —    —     —     2011     8/26/10     —       3,600     —       11.28     40,608  

Thomas J. Pancheri

  2010  9/24/09  —    3,600  —    8.15   29,340

C. Michelle Paulus

  2010  9/24/09  —    3,600  —    8.15   29,340

Thomas Pancheri1

   2011     8/26/10     —       3,600     —       11.28     40,608  

Edward J. Ratinoff

  2010  5/20/10  —    7,058    14.17   100,012   2011     8/26/10     —       1,200     —       11.28     13,536  

Gordon L. Witter, Jr.

  2010  9/24/09  —    4,000  —    8.15   32,600   2011     8/26/10     —       4,000     —       11.28     45,120  

1

Mr. Pancheri’s grant was cancelled upon his resignation effective October 21, 2010.

Outstanding Equity Awards at the end of Fiscal 20102011

This table shows the equity awards that have been previously awarded to each of the Directorsdirectors and which remained outstanding as of June 30, 2010.2011:

 

  Option Awards  Stock Awards

Name

  Number  of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
  Option
Exercise
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
 Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)6
  Option Awards   Stock Awards 

Theodore Allrich

  1,708  —    4.19  4/2/2011  1,5341  21,660
  11,010  —    10.00  12/30/2011  3,0672  43,306

Name

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable
   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable
   Option
Exercise
Price
($)
   Option
Expiration
Date
   Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested  (#)
 Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not  Vested
($)7
 
   11,010     —       10.00     12/30/2011     1,5341   22,105  
  5,807  —    10.00  6/30/2014  4,6003  64,952   5,807     —       10.00     6/30/2014     3,0672   44,195  
  6,900  —    9.50  7/25/2015  —     —     6,900     —       9.50     7/25/2015     10,0005   144,100  
  7,500  —    9.20  8/22/2015  —     —     7,500     —       9.20     8/22/2015     —      —    
  6,900  —    7.35  7/24/2016  —     —     6,900     —       7.35     7/24/2016     —      —    

John Gary Burke

  7,500  —    8.50  11/28/2015  1,2001  16,944   7,500     —       9.50     11/28/2015     1,2001   17,292  
  5,400  —    7.35  7/24/2016  2,4002  33,888   5,400     —       7.35     7/24/2016     2,4002   34,584  
  —    —    —    —    3,6003  50,832   —       —       —       —       3,6005   51,876  

James J. Court

   —       —       —       —       6,4116   92,383  

Jerry F. Englert

  6,643  —    4.19  4/2/2011  1,6661  23,524   11,010     —       10.00     12/30/2011     1,6671   24,021  
  11,010  —    10.00  12/30/2011  3,3342  47,076
  5,810  —    10.00  6/30/2014  5,0003  70,600   5,810     —       10.00     6/30/2014     3,3342   48,043  
  7,500  —    9.50  7/25/2015  —     —     7,500     —       9.50     7/25/2015     4,6005   66,286  
  7,500  —    7.35  7/24/2016  —     —     7,500     —       7.35     7/24/2016     —      —    

Paul Grinberg

  10,000  —    10.00  4/10/2014  1,5341  21,660   10,000     —       10.00     4/10/2014     1,5341   22,105  
  6,900  —    9.50  7/25/2015  3,0672  43,306   6,900     —       9.50     7/25/2015     3,0672   44,195  
  6,900  —    7.35  7/24/2016  4,6003  64,952   6,900     —       7.35     7/24/2016     4,6005   66,286  

Nicholas A. Mosich

  —    —    —    —    6,6674  94,138   —       —       —       —       3,3343   48,043  

Thomas J. Pancheri

  2,656  —    4.19  4/2/2011  1,2001  16,944
   —       —       —       —       3,6005   51,876  

Thomas Pancheri8

   —       —       —       —       —      —    

Edward J. Ratinoff

   —       —       —       —       4,7064   67,813  
   —       —       —       —       1,2005   17,292  

Gordon L. Witter, Jr.9

   4,404     —       10.00     12/30/2011     —      —    
  4,404  —    10.00  12/30/2011  2,4002  33,888   5,807     —       10.00     6/30/2014     —      —    
  5,807  —    10.00  6/30/2014  3,6003  50,832   5,400     —       9.50     7/25/2015     —      —    
  5,400  —    9.50  7/25/2015  —     —     5,400     —       7.35     7/24/2016     —      —    
  5,400  —    7.35  7/24/2016  —     —  

Edward J. Ratinoff

  —    —    —    —    7,0585  99,659

Gordon L. Witter, Jr.

  2,656  —    4.19  4/2/2011  1,2001  16,944
  4,404  —    10.00  12/30/2011  2,6672  37,658
  5,807  —    10.00  6/30/2014  4,0003  56,480
  5,400  —    9.50  7/25/2015  —     —  
  5,400  —    7.35  7/24/2016  —     —  

 

(1)1

These shares were granted on October 20, 2007 and vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

(2)

These shares were granted on August 21, 2008 and vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

(3)2

These shares were granted September 24, 2009 and vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

(4)3

These shares were granted June 25, 2009 and vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

(5)4

These shares were granted May 20, 2010 and vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

(6)5

These shares were granted August 21, 2010 and vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

6

These shares were granted April 21, 2011 and vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

7

The values contained in this column were calculated by multiplying the number of shares by $14.12,$14.41, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock reported on the NASDAQ on June 30, 2010.2011.

8

Mr. Pancheri’s options were exercised before June 30, 2011. Upon his resignation, the unvested restricted stock units were vested and issued; excluding the August 26, 2010 grant, which was cancelled.

9

Mr. Witter’s unvested restricted stock units were vested and issued upon the event of his passing.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Introduction: Overview and Process

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis of compensation arrangements of our Named Executives for 2011, which we refer to as the CD&A, should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures set forth below. The discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on our current plans, considerations, expectations and determinations regarding future compensation programs. The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors of the Company is responsible for designingassisting the Board of Directors in determining and maintaining the Company’s compensation programs consistent with the objectives set forth below. The Compensation Committee establishesmakes recommendations to the Board of Directors of the Company to establish all the forms of compensation, including the base salary, bonus, and both the value of the equity award and the mix of equity vehicles for the Company’s executives including the Named Executives consisting of the company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and the three most highly paid executive officers based on 2010 compensation. References to “executives” in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, includes the Named Executives, unless otherwise specified.Officer.

The Company provides for a base salary that wasis determined according to competitive pay practices, level of responsibility, prior experience and breadth of knowledge. The Bank useduses its discretion rather than a formal weighting system to evaluate these factors and to determine individual base salary levels. In certain situations, the employment agreement defines annual base salary increases. The Compensation Committee reviews all executive base salaries annually.

Objectives of Our Compensation Programs

The Company’s compensation programs have been designed with the following objectives in mind:

 

Total compensation amounts should be sufficiently competitive with industry peer companies to enable the Company to attract and retain top executive talent, while also being consistent with the Company’s objective of maintaining a competitive and efficient cost structure.

 

A substantial portion of each executive’s pay should be performance-based compensation that is variable based on the Company’s annual and long-term operating performance and long-term shareholder returns, and should be aligned with the Company’s business strategy.

 

Compensation should be commensurate with the role, scope, and complexity of each executive’s position relative to other executives and employees.

The Company’s compensation programs reflect its position as a growing company in the highly competitive, dynamic and consolidating financial services industry. The Company uses a variety of elements to support the objective of making compensation sufficiently competitive to attract and retain top talent, provide incentives and rewards to executives, and ensure that management’s interests are aligned with shareholder interests.

Setting Compensation Levels

The Company provides for a base salary that wasis determined according to competitive pay practices, level of responsibility, prior experience and breadth of knowledge. The Company useduses its discretion rather than a formal weighting system to evaluate these factors and to determine individual base salary levels. Mr. Garrabrants’ employment agreement defines annual base salary only for the 2008 fiscal year. Mr. Micheletti’s employment agreement defines annual base salary for the 2010 fiscal year only. The Compensation Committee reviews all executive base salaries annually.

The following table summarizes the primary elements of the Company’s direct compensation arrangements and how theysuch elements support the Company’s other compensation objectives in the short and long term:

Components of Direct Compensation

 

Element

  

Character

  

How Objectives Are Met

Base Salary  Short Term  Helps ensure that compensation is commensurate with the role, scope and complexity of each executive’s position relative to other executives and employees.
Annual Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (Cash & Deferred Bonus)  Short Term  Varies based on the Company’s attaining of annual performance measures that are aligned with the business strategy and shareholders’ interests.
Stock Options  Long Term  Varies based on long-term stock price performance and promotes shareholders’ interests.
Restricted Stock  Long Term  Varies based on long-term total shareholder return and promotes shareholders’ interests.

Salary and Annual Incentive Compensation

The Company provides each Named Executive with a base salary that is commensurate with the role, scope, and complexity of his position relative to other executives and employees. The base salary of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are subject to Compensation Committee approval. In establishing salaries for the named officersChief Executive Officer and other executives,the Chief Financial Officer, the Compensation Committee reviews (i) the historical performance of those officers and other executives; and (ii) available information regarding prevailing salaries and compensation programs at banks and other financial services organizations which are comparable, in terms of asset-size, capitalization and performance to the Bank. Another factor, which is considered in establishing salaries of executive officers,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is the cost of living in Southern California, which generally is higher than in other parts of the country.

The Company sets annual cash and deferredrestricted stock bonus ranges for each Namedthe Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer based on annual Company performance measures established by the Compensation Committee pursuant to the executive’s employment agreement or when merited. The employment agreement bonuses paid to Named Executivesthe Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer are determined based on a pre-established formula measuring the Company’s performance against criteria that we believe are drivers for creating shareholder value and achieving the Company’s strategic goals.

Long-termLong-Term Equity Incentive Compensation

The Company designed its 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2004 Plan”) with a focus on aligning Named Executive incentives with long-term shareholder value. A combination of stock options and restricted stock awards are used by the Company to create a long-term incentive program. Performance shares are also available for award in the future under the 2004 Plan.

When establishing each Named Executive’sthe Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer total long-term equity incentive award, the Compensation Committee first sets a base number of option shares for each Named Executive’s aggregate equity award. The Company’s philosophy is to pay its employees competitively, and as a result the Committee does not consider the amount of stock owned by our Named Executives from prior awards when determining the amount of their annual equity awards. The Named Executive’s equity award may be converted by the Compensation Committee into a number of shares of restricted stock units for the Chief Executive Officer and stock options.the Chief Financial Officer. Generally, the base award is adjusted up or down based upon performance factors.

Stock Options and Restricted Stock

Company stock options have an exercise price equal to the NASDAQ-reported closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. The stock options granted under the 2004 Plan vest over four years, one-fourth on the first anniversary of the award and then one forty-eighth monthly until fully vested. Company stock options generally expire ten years after the grant date, unless they are first exercised. The expiration period is also accelerated if the holder’s employment with us terminates under certain circumstances.

The restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards granted under the 2004 Plan generally vest over three years, one-third on each one-year anniversary of the award. The initial restricted stock grant made to Mr. Garrabrants vests over four years, one-fourth at the end of each fiscal year.

Deferred Compensation Plan

The Company also sponsors an unsecured non-qualified plan known as the Deferred Compensation Plan, which allows Named Executives and certain other highly compensated employees to defer all or a portion of their base salary, bonus, and other compensation after it vests. Balances in the plan receive earnings accrual credits. All credits to the Deferred Compensation Plan represent a Named Executive’s compensation previously earned and deferred; the Company does not provide any matching or similar credits. The plan was designed to allow Named Executives to defer somea portion of their current income in reference to help them with tax planning, and to assist the Company in attracting and retaining top executives by providing retirement benefits that are competitive within the Company’s peer group.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table shows all fiscal 20102011 compensation paid by the Company to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the other three most highly paidcompensated executive officers based on fiscal 20102011 compensation. All individuals listed in the following table are referred to in this Proxy Statement as the “Named Executives.” Annual Compensation includes amounts deferred at the election of the Named Executive’s election.Executive.

 

Name and Principal Position

  Year  Salary ($)1  Bonus
($)
  
Stock
Awards
($)2
  Option
Awards ($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)
  Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqual. Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)3
  All  Other
Comp.
($)4
  Total ($)

Gregory Garrabrants

  2010  311,363  171,000  669,600  —    —    —    —    1,151,963

President and

  2009  311,910  171,000  268,400  —    —    —    —    751,310

Chief Executive Officer

  2008  250,629  171,000  581,000  —    —    —    166,094  1,168,723

Gary Lewis Evans

  2010  224,231  10,000  —    —    —    —    220,000  454,231

Former

  2009  253,096  —    —    —    —    —    —    253,096

Chief Operating Officer

  2008  245,385  —    —    —    —    712  —    246,097

Andrew J. Micheletti

  2010  228,654  —    120,001  —    —    —    —    348,655

Executive Vice President and

  2009  229,826  50,000  —    —    —    —    —    279,826

Chief Financial Officer

  2008  211,923  50,000  —    —    —    427  —    262,350

Craig Cross

  2010  159,012  34,500  30,009  —    —    —    —    223,521

Chief Operating Officer, 1st

  —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —  

Mortgage Lending

  —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —  

James H. Thomas

  2010  152,237  25,593  20,005  —    —    —    —    197,835

Vice President,

  2009  150,191  12,000  —    —    —    —    —    162,191

Finance

  2008  85,769  8,000  —    —    —    —    13,020  106,789

Name and Principal Position

 Year  Salary  ($)1  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)2
  Option
Awards
($)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)
  Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqual.  Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
  All Other
Compensation3
($)
  Total ($) 

Gregory Garrabrants,

  2011    304,841    176,130    2,707,200    —      —      —      —      3,188,171  

President and

  2010    288,782    171,000    669,600    —      —      —      —      1,129,382  

Chief Executive Officer

  2009    295,961    171,000    268,400    —      —      —      —      735,361  

Andrew J. Micheletti,

  2011    212,885    61,500    507,600    —      —      —      —      781,985  

Executive Vice President and

  2010    205,000    —      120,001    —      —      —      —      325,001  

Chief Financial Officer

  2009    206,808    50,000    —      —      —      —      —      256,808  

Adriaan van Zyl,

  2011    207,692    45,000    45,019    —      —      —      —      297,711  

Executive Vice President

  2010    15,385    —      —      —      —      —      —      15,385  

and Chief Operating Officer

  2009    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Thomas M. Constantine,

  2011    158,173    30,000    70,024    —      —      —      —      258,197  

Executive Vice President

  2010    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

and Chief Credit Officer

  2009    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

Brian Swanson,

  2011    109,423    72,000    50,037    —      —      —      —      231,460  

Senior Vice President,

  2010    49,288    —      —      —      —      —      1,683    50,971  

Residential Lending

  2009    —      —      —      —      —      —      —      —    

 

(1)1

Salaries for our Named Executives performance in 2009 and 2008 were established by our Compensation Committee. Effective JanuaryJuly 1, 2010,2011, Mr. Garrabrants’ salary was increased to $293,550. Effective$375,000. See “Item 4. Approval of the Performance-based Incentive Award Structure of the Chief Executive Officer’s Employment Agreement” herein. In connection with the Company’s annual review of compensation, salaries increased effective July 1, 2009,2011, as follows: Mr. Micheletti’s salary was increasedMicheletti to $205,000.$207,500, Mr. van Zyl to $215,000, Mr. Constantine to $185,000 and Mr. Swanson to $140,000. The variations in the amounts shown as “Salary” for the Named Executives from listed salaries to actual in 2009 above reflect the impact of timing of payments by the Company’s bi-weekly payroll system.

(2)2

The stock awards included for each named executive above consists of Restricted Stock Units. The value for each of these awards is its grant date fair value calculated by multiplying the number of units subject to the award by the NASDAQ closing price per share on the date such award was granted. The table below shows the award number of shares, the grant date, the per shareper-share fair value, and the total grant date fair value for the stock awards shown. On August 10, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Company made a grant of 53,000 restricted stock units to Mr. Garrabrants with a total value of $660,380, which vest in one-third increments on each of the first three fiscal year-ends following the date of grant, and 15,000 restricted stock units to Mr. Micheletti with a total value of $186,900, which vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant. The restricted stock units have a value of $12.46 per share, which was the closing price on the grant date of August 10, 2011.

(3)3

The amounts reported in this column consisted of above-market interest paid pursuant to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan. In accordance with applicable SEC regulations, the reported above-market interest consists of earnings based on the interest method of accrual in our Deferred Compensation Plan to the extent that the interest rate exceeded 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate.

(4)

This column represents the amount of all compensation paid to the Named Executives that is not reported in any other column of the table. The $166,094$1,683 for Mr. Garrabrants and the $13,020 for Mr. ThomasSwanson represents moving expenses paid by the Company.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 20102011

The table below shows all plan-based awards that the Company made during fiscal 20102011 to the Named Executives.Executives:

 

Name

 Grant Date  Estimated Possible Future
Payouts Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
 Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
 All  Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)1
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
  Closing
Price  of
Stock on
Date of
Grant
($/Sh)
  Grant
Date
Fair

Value of
Stock
and

Option
Awards
($)
 
 Threshold
($)
 Target
($)
 Maximum
($)
 Threshold
(#)
 Target
(#)
 Maximum
(#)
 

Gregory Garrabrants

  8/26/10    —      —      —      —      —      —      240,000    —      —      11.28    2,707,200  

Andrew J. Micheletti

  8/26/10    —      —      —      —      —      —      45,000    —      —      11.28    507,600  

Adriaan van Zyl

  7/22/10    —      —      —      —      —      —      716    —      —      13.97    10,003  
  12/16/10    —      —      —      —      —      —      977    —      —      15.36    15,007  
     Estimated Possible Future
Payouts Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
  Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan
Awards
  All  Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
or Units
(#)(1)
  All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/Sh)
  Closing
Price  of
Stock on
Date of
Grant
($/Sh)
  Grant
Date  Fair
Value of
Stock  and
Option
Awards
($)
  6/16/11    —      —      —      —      —      —      1,352    —      —      14.80    20,010  

Name

  Grant Date  Threshold
($)
  Target
($)
  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  Target
(#)
  Maximum
(#)
  

Gregory Garrabrants

  10/22/2009  —    —    —    —    —    —    80,000  —    —    8.37  669,600

Gary Lewis Evans

  —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —    —  

Andrew J. Micheletti

  10/22/2009  —    —    —    —    —    —    14,337  —    —    8.37  120,001

Craig Cross

  9/24/2009  —    —    —    —    —    —    1,227  —    —    8.15  10,000

Thomas M. Constantine

  8/26/10    —      —      —      —      —      —      4,433    —      —      11.28    50,004  
  1/21/2010  —    —    —    —    —    —    2,017  —    —    9.92  20,009  12/16/10    —      —      —      —      —      —      652    —      —      15.36    10,015  

James H. Thomas

  9/24/2009  —    —    —    —    —    —    1,227  —    —    8.15  10,000
  8/24/2009  —    —    —    —    —    —    1,662  —    —    6.02  10,005  6/16/11    —      —      —      —      —      —      676    —      —      14.80    10,005  

Brian Swanson

  7/22/10    —      —      —      —      —      —      179    —      —      13.97    2,501  
  10/21/10    —      —      —      —      —      —      201    —      —      12.49    2,510  
  12/16/10    —      —      —      —      —      —      1,303    —      —      15.36    20,014  
  6/16/11    —      —      —      —      —      —      1,690    —      —      14.80    25,012  

 

(1)1

All restrictedRestricted stock grants for Mr. Garrabrants vest overin one-third increments on each of the first three years.fiscal year-ends following the date of grant, for all others, vesting is in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

Outstanding Equity Awards at the end of Fiscal 20102011

This table shows the equity awards that have been previously awarded to each of the Named Executives and which remained outstanding as of June 30, 2010.2011:

 

  Option Awards  Stock Awards  Option Awards   Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Option (#)
Exercisable
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Option (#)
Unexercisable
  Option
Exercise 
Price
($)
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of 
Shares or
Units of
Stock That 
Have Not
Vested (#)
 Market Value 
of Shares or
Units of Stock 
That Have
Not Vested
($)5
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Option (#)
Exercisable
   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Option (#)
Unexercisable
   Option
Exercise
Price
($)
   Option
Expiration
Date
   Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
 Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)9
 
 

Gregory Garrabrants

  —    —    —    —    88,7501  1,253,150   —       —       —       —       26,6671   384,271  

Gary Lewis Evans

  —    —    —    —    —     —  
           160,0002   2,305,600  

Andrew J. Micheletti

  26,250  —    4.19  4/2/11  14,3372 202,438   12,500     —       10.00     1/28/12     9,5583   137,731  
  12,500  —    10.00  1/28/12  —     —     20,000     —       10.00     6/30/14     45,0005   648,450  
  20,000  —    10.00  6/30/14  —     —     50,000     —       9.50     7/25/15     —      —    
  50,000  —    9.50  7/25/15  —     —     20,000     —       7.35     7/24/16     —      —    

Adriaan van Zyl

   —       —       —       —       7164   10,318  
  19,583  417  7.35  7/24/16  —     —     —       —       —       —       9777   14,079  

Craig Cross

  —    —    —    —    3,2443  45,805

James H. Thomas

  —    —    —    —    2,3354  32,970
   —       —       —       —       1,5328   19,482  

Thomas M. Constantine

   —       —       —       —       4,4335   63,880  
   —       —       —       —       6527   9,395  
   —       —       —       —       6768   9,741  

Brian Swanson

   —       —       —       —       1794   2,579  
   —       —       —       —       2016   2,896  
   —       —       —       —       1,3037   18,776  
   —       —       —       —       1,6908   24,353  

 

(1)

Consists of 20,750 restricted stock units granted on November 20, 2007,14,667 restricted stock units granted on April 23, 2008 and 26,667 restricted stock units granted on October 22, 2009. These grants vest on June 30, 2012. Additionally, 26,666 restricted stock units granted on October 22, 2009 vest on June 30, 2012.

(2)1

These 14,337 restricted stock unitsshares were granted on October 22, 2009. All grants2009 and vest in one-third increments on each of the first three fiscal year-ends following the date of grant.

2

These shares were granted on August 26, 2010 and vest in one-third increments on each of the first three fiscal year-ends following the date of grant.

3

These shares were granted on October 22, 2009 and vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

(3)4

Consists of 1,227 restricted stock unitsThese shares were granted September 24, 2009on July 22, 2010 and 2,017 restricted stock units granted January 21, 2010. All grants vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

(4)5

Consists of 1,108 restricted stock unitsThese shares were granted on August 21, 200926, 2010 and 1,227 restricted stock units granted September 24, 2009. All grants vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

(5)6

These shares were granted on October 21, 2010 and vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

7

These shares were granted on December 16, 2010 and vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

8

These shares were granted on June 16, 2011 and vest in one-third increments on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant.

9

The values contained in this column were calculated by multiplying the number of shares by $14.12,$14.41, which was the closing price of the Company’s common stock reported on the NASDAQ on June 30, 2010.2011.

Exercised Options and Vested Restricted Stock in Fiscal 20102011

This table shows the stock options that were exercised by, and the restricted stock that vested for, each Named Executive during fiscal 2010.2011:

 

   Option Awards  Stock Awards

Name

  Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise (#)
  Value Realized on
Exercise ($)
  Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting (#)
  Value Realized on
Vesting ($)

Gregory Garrabrants1

  —    —    41,333  876,612

Gary Lewis Evans

  179,009  1,039,319  —    —  

Andrew J. Micheletti

  —    —    —    —  

Craig Cross

  —    —    —    —  

James H. Thomas2

  —    —    554  3,812
   Option Awards     Stock Awards 

Name

  Number of  Shares
Acquired on Exercise (#)
   Value Realized  on
Exercise ($)
     Number of  Shares
Acquired on Vesting (#)
   Value Realized on
Vesting ($)
 
 

Gregory Garrabrants1

   —       —        121,333     1,748,409  
 

Andrew J. Micheletti2

   26,250     392,963      4,779     64,612  
 

Adriaan van Zyl

   —       —        —       —    
 

Thomas M. Constantine

   —       —        —       —    
 

Brian Swanson

   —       —        —       —    

 

(1)1

Mr. Garrabrants chose to net settle his shares upon vesting, selling back to the Company 19,29456,638 shares of the 41,333121,333 vested shares to cover his income tax withholding and 20,750 shares were deferred receipt. Realized value includes all 62,083142,083 shares that vested. On September 1, 2010, Mr. Garrabrants took deferred receipt of 20,750 shares that vested June 30, 2009. The value upon vesting was $126,368. He chose to net settle his shares upon issue, selling 4,970 shares back to the Company.

(2)2

Mr. ThomasMicheletti chose to net settle his shares upon vesting, selling back to the Company 2381,779 shares of the 5544,779 vested shares to cover his income tax withholding.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted the Bank of Internet USA Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan to provide designated key executive and management employees with an opportunity to defer additional compensation beyond the limitations imposed on our 401(k) plan by the Internal Revenue Code. The liabilities associated with the plan are unfunded and unsecured. Our Named Executives are currently eligible to participate and three currently participate in the plan. We also have a substantially similar deferred compensation plan for our outside directors, two of whom are currently participating.

Elective Deferrals - Our deferred compensation plan allows eligible employees to elect to defer up to 100% of their compensation, including commissions and bonuses. Although the plan provides that we may make discretionary contributions to a participant’s account, no such discretionary contributions have been made to date. Participant deferrals are fully vested at all times, and discretionary contributions, if any, will be subject to a vesting schedule specified by us.

Non-equity Incentive Plan Bonus Deferrals - Named Executives are awarded annual non-equity incentive bonuses based on quantitative criteria defined in the employment agreement. The criteria are based on the Bank’s profitability and asset growth. No more than one-half of the bonuses may be paid in cash and the remainder contributed to the Named Executive’s deferred compensation plan. The employment agreement defines a three-year vesting period for amounts contributed to the deferred compensation plan. No non-equity incentive bonuses awarded were deferred to Named Executives in fiscal 2009 or 2010. As provided by the employment agreement in 2003, the Company contributed a one-time amount to Named Executives deferred compensation plan. The deferred compensation and all earnings vest incrementally over a five-year period and was fully vested on July 1, 2008.

The table below shows the activity in the Deferred Compensation Plan during fiscal 2010 for the Named Executives.

Name and Principal Position

  Executive
Contributions
In Fiscal
2010
  Company
Contributions
In Fiscal
2010
  Earnings
In Fiscal
2010
  Paid out
In Fiscal
2010
  Aggregate
Balance
At June 30,
2010
  Vested
Balance
At June 30,
2010

Gregory Garrabrants

   —    —     —     —     —     —  

    President and Chief Executive Officer

            

Gary Lewis Evans

  $550  —    $203  $8,547  $1,189  $1,189

    Former Chief Operating Officer

            

Andrew J. Micheletti

   —    —     282   14,262   —     —  

    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

            

Craig Cross

   —    —     —     —     —     —  

    Chief Operating Officer, 1st Mortgage Lending

            

James H. Thomas

   —    —     —     —     —     —  

    Vice President, Finance

            

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

This section discusses the incremental compensation that would be payable by the Company to each Named Executive in the event of a change-in-control of the Company or a termination of theemployment of certain Named Executive’s employmentExecutives with the Company for various described reasons, sometimes referred to in this section as a “triggering event.” In accordance with applicable SEC rules the following discussion assumes:

 

(i)that the triggering event in question – death, disability, change in control or termination – occurred on June 30, 2010,2011, the last business day of fiscal 2010;2011; and

 

(ii)with respect to calculations based on the Company’s stock price, we used $14.12,$14.41, which was the reported closing price of one share of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ on June 30, 2010.2011.

Pursuant to applicable SEC rules, the analysis contained in this section does not consider or include payments made to a Named Executive with respect to contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements to the extent they do not discriminate in scope, terms, or operation in favor of executive officers of the Company, such as employee group term life insurance. In addition, in connection with any actual termination of employment, the Company may determine to enter into an agreement or to establish an arrangement providing additional benefits or amounts, or altering the terms of benefits provided upon the events discussed below, any actual amounts paid or distributed may be higher or lower than reported below. Factors that could affect these amounts include, for example, the timing during the year of any event and the Company’s stock price.

The Company believes that severance protections can play a valuable role in attracting and retaining key executive officers. Accordingly, we provide such protections for our Named Executive Officers under their respective employment agreements. The Compensation Committee evaluates the level of severance benefits to provide a Named Executive Officer on a case-by-case basis, and in general, we consider these severance protections an important part of an executive’s compensation and consistent with competitive practices.

Various agreements and plans define each Named Executive’s rights and obligations in the event of a triggering event. For example, Named Executives may be a party to an agreement with the Company called an “employment agreement’ and may also be a party to an equity award agreement.

The following is a general discussion of the primary categories of triggering events pursuantwhich apply to certain of the Company’s Named Executives’ employment agreements and the Company plans. Mr. Cross and Mr. Thomas are not parties to employment agreements with the Company.Executives.

Death or Disability

The Named Executives’ employment agreements generally provide that the Company shall make no further cash payments to the Named Executive, or his estate, in the event of death or disability, except payment of a death benefit of three times executive’s then-current annual salary. Generally, all vested stock option grants at the date of death or disability may be exercised by the beneficiaries of the Named Executive for a period of up to twelve (12) months after date of death or disability.

Upon death or disability, cash bonuses payable to a Named Executive are prorated based on the number of days of active service during the fiscal year prior to the triggering event. The Company’s performance continues to be measured against the applicable performance measures at the end of the applicable fiscal year.

Each Named Executive, or his beneficiaries, will receive payments or benefits under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan to the extent of their vested and accrued balances. The plan, including the Named Executives’ plan balances or accrued amounts, as applicable, are described in detail beginning on page 23 of this Proxy Statement. In general, this plan provides for either the payment of a lump-sum or installment payments. Between the date of the applicable triggering event and the date benefits are distributed, each Named Executive’s benefits under these plans continue to accrue earnings. In each Named Executive’s employment agreement, “termination due to disability” is generally defined as the Named Executive being unable to perform the essential functions of his job for a continuous period of 90 days.

For Mr. Garrabrants, in the event that his employment terminates by reason of disability, he shall be entitled to receive (i) the immediate vesting, to the extent not otherwise vested, of all outstanding equity incentive awards including Restricted Stock Unit Awards granted to him, and (ii) his Short-Term Cash Incentive Award for the period in which the Termination Date occurs, prorated to the Termination Date, to be paid in a lump-sum within 30 days of termination, as such terms are defined in the plan.

Additionally, upon Mr. Garrabrants’ receipt of a Notice of Termination for Disability, he shall receive, at the option of Employer (i) his Annual Restricted Stock Unit Award for the period in which the Termination Date occurs, prorated to the Termination Date, or (ii) an equivalent amount of cash payable in a lump-sum at termination at the option of the Employer.

In the event of the death of Mr. Garrabrants, he shall have designated athe Chief Executive Officer, his beneficiary in writing or in the absence of such a designation, his estate shall be entitled to receive (i) the immediate vesting, to the extent not otherwise vested, of all equity incentive awards including Restricted Stock Unit Awardsrestricted stock unit awards granted to him, and (ii) his Short-Term Cash Incentive Awardshort-term cash incentive award for the period in which Deathdeath occurs, prorated to the date of Death,death, to be paid in a lump-sum within 30 days of termination.

Upon the Chief Executive Officer’s receipt of a notice of termination for disability, he shall receive, at the option of the Company (i) his annual restricted stock unit award for the period in which the termination date occurs, prorated to the termination date, or (ii) an equivalent amount of cash payable in a lump-sum at termination.

In the event of the death of the Chief Financial Officer, his estate shall receive a payment of a death benefit of three times the executive’s then-current annual salary. In the event of the death or disability of the Chief Financial Officer, his estate shall receive his cash bonus for the year prorated to the date of death. All vested stock option grants at the date of death or disability may be exercised by him or his beneficiaries for a period of up to twelve (12) months after the date of death or disability.

None of the Named Executives has contributed to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan; therefore no payments would be made upon death, disability or any other triggering event.

Termination of Employment by the Company

In accordance with their employment agreements, if a NamedFor the Chief Executive is terminated by the Company, without cause, he would be entitled to:

a severance payment equal to his then-current base monthly salary multiplied by twelve (12) and paid either as a lump-sum or in monthly installments, at the discretion of the Board of Directors;

accelerated vesting of all unvested portions of stock option and restricted stock awards; and

continuation of group medical insurance benefits to the earlier of the end of the 12-month severance period or the executive’s commencement of work for a new employer that provides group medical insurance.

The Named Executive will receive payments or benefits under the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan to the extent of his vested and accrued balances, as described in the death and disability section above.

For Mr. Garrabrants,Officer, in the event such officer’shis employment is terminated by Employer Without Cause,Company without cause, or such officerhe resigns his employment for Good Reason,good reason, within a period of 90 days after the occurrence of the event giving rise to Good Reason,good reason, he shall be entitled to (i) the immediate vesting, to the extent not otherwise vested, of all equity incentive awards including Restricted Stock Unit awards granted to him, (ii) his target Short-Term Cash Incentive Award for the period in which such termination occurs, prorated to the Termination Date to be paid in a lump sum within 30 days of termination, and (iii) payment of an amount equal to two times his then-current base salary, to be paid in lump sum within 30 days of termination.

In addition, upon Mr. Garrabrants’Chief Executive Officer receipt from Employerthe Company of a Noticenotice of Termination Without Causetermination without cause or Employer’sCompany’s receipt from him of a Noticenotice of Terminationtermination for Good Reason,good reason, he shall receive, at the option of Employer,the Company, either (iv) his Annual Restricted Stock Unit Awardannual restricted stock unit award computed pursuant to contract, for the fiscal year in which the Termination Date occurs, except that to the extent that the ROE multiplier (if the quarter immediately prior to the Notice of Termination washis employment agreement using a fiscal year end) or Prorated ROE Multiplier (if the quarter immediately prior to the Notice of Termination wasfactor not a fiscal year end) is less than one the amount shall be computed assuming the product is equal to one or (iv) an equivalent amount of cash payable in a lump-sum at termination.

For the Chief Financial Officer, in the event his employment is terminated by the Company without cause, he shall be entitled to (i) a severance payment equal to his then-current base monthly salary multiplied by twelve (12) and paid either as a lump-sum or in monthly installments, at the discretion of the Board of Directors; (ii) accelerated vesting of all unvested portions of stock option and restricted stock awards; and (iii) continuation of group medical insurance benefits to the earlier of the end of the 12-month severance period or the executive’s commencement of work for a new employer that provides group medical insurance.

For the Chief Credit Officer, in the event his employment is terminated by the Company without cause, he shall be entitled to (i) a severance payment equal to his then-current bi-weekly salary paid for 12 months from the date of termination; and (ii) accelerated vesting of all unvested portions of stock option and restricted stock awards, subject to his execution of a legal agreement with the Company.

Termination by Company with “Cause” or by the Named Executive for any Reason

In accordance with each Named Executive’s employment agreement, if such Named Executive is terminated by the Company withWith “cause”, then the Named Executive would not be entitled to any cash severance payments. In addition, all generally includes (i) failure of the Named Executive’s outstanding stock options, whether vested or unvested, and unvested shares of restricted stock, would be immediately forfeited and cancelled pursuant to the applicable equity award agreements. The employment agreements generally define “cause” to include (i) failureexecutive to perform duties in a satisfactory manner, after notice thereof; (ii) conviction of illegal activity which materially adversely affects Bank’s reputation or which evidences the executive’s lack of ability to perform duties; (iii) certain crimes or dishonesty, fraud, etc. which causes termination of insurance coverage under blanket bond; or (v) actions by government bank regulators to close or take the Bank or to issue a cease and desist order to remove executive from office.

Cash bonus payments pursuant to the Company’s non-equity incentive plans would be prorated based on the number of days of active service during the calendar year prior to the termination. The Company’s performance continues to be measured against the applicable performance measures at the end of the applicable fiscal year.

If the Named Executive resigns his employment for any reason, the employment agreements and plan documents do not provide for any additional compensation or benefits for such Named Executive. However, the Named Executive would not forfeit his equity awards and other benefits, as described above.

For Mr. Garrabrants inIn the event hethe Chief Executive Officer is terminated with “cause” or in the event that he terminates his employment for any reason, the following benefits shallhis payments will generally be the only termination benefits he is entitled to from the Company: (i) all accrued but unpaid Base Salarybase salary and vacation benefits as of the Termination Date (“Accrued Benefits”)termination date and (ii) any other benefits already vested as of the Termination Datetermination date under any of his applicable equity compensation, pension, cash incentive compensation, or similar plans in which he participated immediately prior to termination (“Vested Benefits”).

termination. In the event of Mr. Garrabrants’ Resignation Without Good Reason,the Chief Executive Officer resigns without good reason, he shall be entitled to payment of his Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation earned for the period prior to resignation but unpaid at the time of resignation.

In the event the Chief Financial Officer is terminated with “cause” or in the event that he terminates his employment for any reason, his payments will generally be limited to (i) all accrued but unpaid base salary and vacation benefits as of the termination date and (ii) any other benefits already vested as of the termination date under any of his applicable equity compensation, pension, cash incentive compensation and other compensation earned subject to prorate calculations as of the termination date.

Upon a Change-in-Control of the Company

A “Change in Control” generally occurs when there is in effect a change in the ownership or control of 50% of the voting stock of the Company, whether by sale, merger or reorganization, or the ownership or control of all or substantially all of the assets are sold or transferred to a person who did not own or control the assets of the Company prior to such transaction. The exact definition varies depending upon the terms of agreement with Named Executives’Executives.

If the employment agreements do not provideof the Chief Executive Officer is terminated, during the term of his employment agreement, if within three months before or within two years after a Change in Control, and the Company or the Company’s successor terminates him other than for cause, death or disability or the Chief Executive Officer terminates his employment other than for good reason, in either case, “a Change of Control Termination,” then:

(i) The Company shall pay him in a single severance payment as soon as practicable after the termination, but in no event later than thirty (30) days thereafter, an amount in cash equal to three times the sum of (a) his then-current base salary and (b) his target Annual Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation Award as in effect on the termination date, plus

(ii) any additionalunvested equity incentive award including restricted stock unit awards shall become immediately and fully vested.

Additionally, if the Chief Executive Officer receives a notice of termination and the termination when effective shall be a Change of Control Termination, the Company shall grant to him immediately upon receipt of the notice of termination, a restricted stock unit award, or if unable under the terms of extant equity compensation payableplan(s), an equivalent amount of cash, equal to two times his annual restricted stock compensation award for the current fiscal year, except that to the Named Executivesextent that the calculation factor is less than one, the amount shall be computed assuming the factor is equal to one times his annual award.

If a Change in Control occurs and the Chief Executive Officer is terminated prior to a Change in Control other than for Cause, and if such termination of employment or event was at the request, suggestion or initiative of a change-in-controlthird party who has taken steps reasonably calculated to effect a Change in Control, then his termination shall be a Change of Control Termination and upon occurrence of the Company. However,Change in Control, such officer shall be entitled to receive the payments as described above.

If the Chief Operating Officer is terminated by the Company or its successor other than for cause, with in two (2) years of a Change of Control, the Company shall (i) make a lump-sum payment of his then-current annual salary within 30 days of termination; and (ii) immediately vest as of the termination date all unvested equity incentive awards.

For all Named Executives, the Company’s Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan and the 2004 Plan (the Plans) provide that as of the consummation of a “corporate transaction,” all outstanding unvested stock options and unvested shares of restricted stock would generally receive accelerated vesting, but only to the extent that such awards are not assumed by the Company or substituted by the acquiring company with all existing terms and conditions, including vesting terms, remaining in effect. For this purpose, “corporate transaction” is generally defined in the plans as an acquisition of the Company by merger, consolidation, asset acquisition or stock purchase, which is generally the same as a change-in-control of the Company.

For Mr. Garrabrants, during the term of his employment agreement, if within two years after a Change in Control, his employment is terminated (a) by Employer or Employer’s successor other than for Cause, Death or Disability or (b) by him for Good Reason, in either case, “a Change of Control Termination,” then:

(i) Employer shall pay him in a single severance payment as soon as practicable after the termination, but in no event later than thirty (30) days thereafter, an amount in cash equal to three times the sum of (a) his then-current Base Salary and (b) his target Annual Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation Award as in effect on the Termination Date, plus

(ii) any unvested equity incentive award including Restricted Stock Unit awards shall become immediately and fully vested.

Additionally, if Mr. Garrabrants receives a Notice of Termination and the termination when effective shall be a Change of Control Termination, Employer shall grant to him immediately upon receipt of the Notice of Termination, a Restricted Stock Unit Award, or if unable under the terms of extant equity compensation plan(s), an equivalent amount of cash, equal to two times his Annual Restricted Stock Compensation Award for the current fiscal year, except that to the extent that the ROE multiplier is less than one, the amount shall be computed assuming the product is equal to one.

If a Change in Control occurs and Mr. Garrabrants employment with Employer is terminated prior to a Change in Control other than for Cause, and if such termination of employment or event was at the request, suggestion or initiative of a third party who has taken steps reasonably calculated to effect a Change in Control, then his termination shall be a Change of Control Termination and upon occurrence of the Change in Control, such officer shall be entitled to receive the payments as described above.

280G Tax Gross-Up

OurIn accordance with the Chief Executive Officer’s employment and change-in-control agreements with Mr. Garrabrants provide thatagreement, if any Company payment made upon termination after a change-in-control of the Company constitutes an “excess parachute payment” under Section 280G of the Code, wethe Company would make a gross-up payment to the Named Executive.Chief Executive Officer. The gross-up payment would be equal to the amount necessary to cause the net amount retained by the NamedChief Executive, after subtracting (i) the excise tax imposed on “excess parachute payments” by Section 4999 of the Code, and (ii) any federal, state and local income taxes, FICA tax, and the Section 4999 excise tax on the gross-up payment, to be equal to the net amount the named executivehe would have retained had no Section 4999 excise tax been imposed and no Company gross-up payment been made. The amount of the Gross-Up Payment in no event shall exceed five hundred thousand ($500,000).

The following tables summarize the approximate value of termination payments and benefits that thecertain Named Executives would have received if their employment had been terminated on June 30, 20102011 under the circumstances specified:specified or if there was a change of control on June 30, 2011:

Gregory Garrabrants – Chief Executive Officer

 

           Termination After
Change-in-Control5, 6
              Termination After
Change-in-Control5, 6
 
  A  B  C  D  E  A   B   C   D   E 

Type of Benefit

  Death
or  Disability
($)
   Termination
before  a Change-
in-Control
by Company
without
Cause ($)
   Upon a
Change-in-
Control  ($)5
   Termination  by
Company for Any
Reason or by
Executive with
Good Reason ($)
   Termination  by
Executive
without Good
Reason ($)
 
  
  
  
  
  Death
or  Disability

($)
  Termination
before a Change-
in-Control by
Company
without

Cause ($)
  Upon a
Change-in-
Control ($)5
  Termination by
Company for Any
Reason or by
Executive with
Good Reason ($)
  Termination by
Executive
without Good
Reason ($)
  

Cash Severance1

  22,581  609,681  —    903,231  22,581   22,581     609,681     —       1,404,621     22,581  

Option Vesting2

  —    —    —    —    —     —       —       —       —       —    

Restricted Stock Vesting3

  4,069,913  4,069,913  4,069,913  748,360  —     2,791,733     3,180,103     2,791,733     1,152,800     —    

280G Tax Gross Up4

  —    —    —    500,000  —     —       —       —       500,000     —    

Total Value Upon Event

  4,092,494  4,679,594  4,069,913  2,151,591  22,581   2,814,314     3,789,784     2,791,733     3,057,421     22,581  
                 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Value Upon CIC and Termination Events in Column D (Column C+D)

        6,221,504           5,849,154    
                   

 

   

Total Value Upon CIC and Termination Event in Column E (Column C+E)

          4,092,494           2,814,314  
                     

 

 

 

(1)1

Mr. Garrabrants’ employment agreement provides for a lump sum cash payment in the amount of two times his annual salary, in the event we terminate his employment, without cause, prior to a change-in-control; or three times his annual salary and target bonus if within two years following a change-in-control, our successor terminates his employment for any reason or by Mr. Garrabrants for good reason. In addition,He is also entitled to any accrued vacation isand his annual cash incentive award. His annual cash incentive award for fiscal 2011 was fully paid out.as of June 30, 2011 and not included in column A or B above. Column D includes an additional amount equal to three times the target amount of the annual cash incentive award.

(2)2

Mr. Garrabrants’ employment agreement provides for the acceleration of vesting of stock options and restricted stock upon his termination (i) by us for any reason other than for cause preceding a change-in-control, or (ii) after a change-in-control, by our successor for any reason or by Mr. Garrabrants’ for good reason (assuming the vesting of his options and stock does not accelerate on the closing of the change-in-control). The value of stock option vesting reflected in the table is zero asbecause Mr. Garrabrants’ does not have any stock options.

(3)3

The value of restricted stock vesting was calculated by multiplying the number of unvested shares of 20,750 by $7.00, unvested shares of 14,667 by $6.10, unvested shares of 53,33326,667, 160,000 and 53,000 by $8.37, with any performance measures through$11.28 and $14.41, respectively. In the end of 2010 factored into the calculation for Death or Disability but not for a Change-in-Control using 240,000 shares at $14.12. Additionally, in the eventcase of termination without cause, Mr. Garrabrants shall receivethe 53,000 share count increases to 80,000 in the previous sentence. In the case of termination after a change in control, an additional stock grant equal to 53,000increment of 40,000 shares which brings his granted shares totimes two multiplied by $14.41 is payable, reflecting change in control per his contract maximum of 500,000 shares.executed May 26, 2011. Mr. Garrabrants’ annual restricted stock unit award changed effective July 1, 2011. See Item 4. in this Proxy.

(4)4

Mr. Garrabrants’ employment agreement provides that if any Company payments made upon termination after a change-in-control of the Company constitutes a “parachute payment” under Section 280G of the Code, the Company would make a gross-up payment to Mr. Garrabrants. The gross-up payment would be equal to the amount necessary to cause the net amount retained by Mr. Garrabrants, after subtracting (i) the parachute payment excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Code, and (ii) any federal, state and local income taxes, FICA tax, and the Section 4999 excise tax on the gross-up payment, to be equal to the net amount Mr. Garrabrants would have retained had no Section 4999 excise tax been imposed and no Company gross-up payment been made. The maximum gross-up payment under his contract is $500,000.

(5)5

These columns assume that the vesting of all unvested stock options and restricted stock accelerated on the consummation of the change-in-control because Mr. Garrabrants’ employment contract did not provide foras provided in the Company’s Plans and there was no assumption or substitution of unvested stock options and restricted stock by the acquiring company.

(6)6

For a change-in-control and subsequent termination of Mr. Garrabrants’ employment, he would have received the “Total Value Upon Event” specified in the table in column C plus the “Total Value Upon Event” in either column D or column E, depending upon the circumstances of his termination.

Andrew J. Micheletti – Chief Financial Officer

           Termination After
Change-in-Control5, 6
              Termination After
Change-in-Control65, 6
 
  A  B  C  D  E  A   B   C   D   E 

Type of Benefit

  Death
or Disability
($)
   Termination
before a Change-
in-Control
by  Company
without

Cause($)
   Upon a
Change-in-
Control($)5
   Termination by
Company for Any
Reason or by
Executive with
Good Reason($)
   Termination by
Executive
without Good
Reason($)
 
  Death
or Disability
($)
  Termination
before a Change-
in-Control  by
Company
without

Cause($)
  Upon a
Change-in-
Control($)(5)
  Termination by
Company for Any
Reason or by
Executive with
Good Reason($)
  Termination by
Executive
without Good
Reason($)
  

Cash Severance1

  638,654  228,654  —    228,654  23,654   699,032     289,032     —       289,032     84,032  

Option Vesting2

  968  968  968  —    —     —         —       —       —    

Restricted Stock Vesting3

  727,894  727,894  727,894  —    —     633,466     633,466     633,466     —       —    

280G Tax Gross Up4

  —    —    —    —    —     —       —       —       —       —    

Total Value Upon Event

  1,367,516  957,516  728,862  228,654  23,654   1,332,498     922,498     633,466     289,032     84,032  
                 

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

   

 

 

Total Value Upon CIC and Termination Events in Column D (Column C+D)

        957,516           922,498    
                   

 

   

Total Value Upon CIC and Termination Event in Column E (Column C+E)

          752,516           717,498  
                     

 

 

 

(1)1

Mr. Micheletti’s employment agreement provides for a lump sum cash payment in the amount of three times his annual salary, in the event of death and one time annual salary if we terminate his employment, without cause, prioremployment. He is also entitled to a change-in-control. In addition, any accrued vacation is paid out.and a prorated annual cash incentive award.

(2)2

Mr. Micheletti’s employment agreement provides for the acceleration of vesting of stock options and restricted stock upon his termination (i) by us for any reason other than for cause preceding a change-in-control, or (ii) after a change-in-control, by our successor (assuming the vesting of his options and stock does not accelerate on the closing of the change-in-control). As of June 30, 2011, all options were fully vested.

(3)3

The value of restricted stock vesting was calculated by multiplying the number of unvested shares of 14,337 by $8.37, less $27,507 already expensed, and unvested shares of 45,000 by $14.12.$11.28, less $142,777 already expensed and unvested shares of 15,000 by $14.41.

(4)4

Mr. Micheletti’s employment agreement does not provide for a gross-up payment under Section 280G of the Code.Not applicable.

(5)5

These columns assume that the vesting of stock options and restricted stock accelerated on the consummation of the change-in-control. This assumes that the acquiring company does not assume such awards.

(6)6

For a change-in-control and subsequent termination of Mr. Micheletti’s employment, he would have received the “Total Value Upon Event” specified in the table in column C plus the “Total Value Upon Event” in either column D or column E, depending upon the circumstances of his termination.

Adriaan van Zyl – Chief Operating Officer

                Termination After
Change-in-Control65, 6
 
    A   B   C   D   E 

Type of Benefit

  Death
or  Disability
($)
   Termination
before a Change-
in-Control
by Company
without
Cause($)
   Upon a
Change-in-
Control($)5
   Termination  by
Company for Any
Reason or by
Executive with
Good Reason($)
   Termination  by
Executive
without Good
Reason($)
 
          
          
          
          
          

Cash Severance1

   14,454     14,454     —       214,454     14,454  

Option Vesting2

   —       —       —       —       —    

Restricted Stock Vesting3

   —       —       38,945     —       —    

280G Tax Gross Up4

   —       —       —       —       —    

Total Value Upon Event

   14,454     14,454     38,945     214,454     14,454  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Value Upon CIC and Termination Events in Column D (Column C+D)

         253,399    
        

 

 

   

Total Value Upon CIC and Termination Event in Column E (Column C+E)

           53,399  
          

 

 

 

1

Mr. van Zyl’s employment agreement provides for a lump sum cash payment in the amount of his annual salary if we terminate his employment, without cause, after a change-in-control. In addition, any accrued vacation is paid out.

2

The value of stock option vesting reflected in the table is zero because Mr. van Zyl does not have any stock options.

3

The value of restricted stock vesting was calculated by multiplying the number of unvested shares of 716 by $13.97, less $3,133 already expensed, unvested shares of 977 by $15.36, less $2,686 already expensed and unvested shares of 1,532 by $14.80, less $256 already expensed.

4

Not applicable.

5

These columns assume that the vesting of stock options and restricted stock accelerated on the consummation of the change-in-control. This assumes that the acquiring company does not assume such awards.

6

For a change-in-control and subsequent termination of Mr. van Zyl’s employment, he would have received the “Total Value Upon Event” specified in the table in column C plus the “Total Value Upon Event” in either column D or column E, depending upon the circumstances of his termination.

Thomas M. Constantine – Chief Credit Officer

                Termination After
Change-in-Control65, 6
 
   A   B   C   D   E 

Type of Benefit

  Death  or
Disability
($)
   Termination
before a Change-
in-Control

by Company
without

Cause($)
   Upon a
Change-in-
Control($)5
   Termination by
Company for Any
Reason or by
Executive with
Good Reason($)
   Termination by
Executive
without Good
Reason($)
 

Cash Severance1

   6,478     181,478     —       181,478     6,478  

Option Vesting2

   —       —       —       —       —    

Restricted Stock Vesting3

   —       54,038     54,038     —       —    

280G Tax Gross Up4

   —       —       —       —       —    

Total Value Upon Event

   6,478     235,516     54,038     181,478     6,478  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Value Upon CIC and Termination Events in Column D (Column C+D)

         235,516    
        

 

 

   

Total Value Upon CIC and Termination Event in Column E (Column C+E)

           60,516  
          

 

 

 

1

Mr. Constantine’s employment agreement provides for a lump sum cash payment in the amount of one time annual salary if we terminate his employment, without cause, prior to or after a change-in-control, by our successor change-in-control. In addition, any accrued vacation is paid out.

2

The value of stock option vesting reflected in the table is zero because Mr. Constantine does not have any stock options.

3

The value of restricted stock vesting was calculated by multiplying the number of unvested shares of 4,433 by $11.28, less $14,065 already expensed, unvested shares of 652 by $15.36, less $1,793 already expensed and unvested shares of 676 by $14.80, less $128 already expensed.

4

Not applicable.

5

These columns assume that the vesting of stock options and restricted stock accelerated on the consummation of the change-in-control. This assumes that the acquiring company does not assume such awards.

6

For a change-in-control and subsequent termination of Mr. Constantine’s employment, he would have received the “Total Value Upon Event” specified in the table in column C plus the “Total Value Upon Event” in either column D or column E, depending upon the circumstances of his termination.

Brian Swanson – Senior Vice President

                Termination After
Change-in-Control65, 6
 
   A   B   C   D   E 

Type of Benefit

  Death  or
Disability
($)
   Termination
before a Change-
in-Control

by Company
without

Cause($)
   Upon a
Change-in-
Control($)5
   Termination by
Company for Any
Reason or by
Executive with
Good Reason($)
   Termination by
Executive
without Good
Reason($)
 

Cash Severance1

   7,034     7,034     —       7,034     7,034  

Option Vesting2

   —       —       —       —       —    

Restricted Stock Vesting3

   —       —       43,056     —       —    

280G Tax Gross Up4

   —       —       —       —       —    

Total Value Upon Event

   7,034     7,034     43,056     7,034     7,034  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Value Upon CIC and Termination Events in Column D (Column C+D)

         50,090    
        

 

 

   

Total Value Upon CIC and Termination Event in Column E (Column C+E)

           50,090  
          

 

 

 

1

Accrued vacation is paid out.

2

The value of stock option vesting reflected in the table is zero because Mr. Swanson does not have any stock options.

3

The value of restricted stock vesting was calculated by multiplying the number of unvested shares of 179 by $13.97, less $783 already expensed, unvested shares of 201 by $12.49, less $578 already expensed, unvested shares of 1,303 by $15.36, less $3,582 already expensed and unvested shares of 1,690 by $14.80, less $320 already expensed.

4

Not applicable.

5

These columns assume that the vesting of stock options and restricted stock accelerated on the consummation of the change-in-control. This assumes that the acquiring company does not assume such awards.

6

For a change-in-control and subsequent termination of Mr. Swansons’s employment, he would have received the “Total Value Upon Event” specified in the table in column C plus the “Total Value Upon Event” in either column D or column E, depending upon the circumstances of his termination.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Members of the Compensation Committee. The members of the Compensation Committee in 20102011 were Gordon Witter, Jr., the Committee’s Chairman,Paul Grinberg, its Chair, Theodore C. Allrich and John Gary Burke, Paul Grinberg and Thomas Pancheri, each of whom was determined by the Board of Directors to be independent within the meaning of that term in the NASDAQ’s listed company rules.

No Interlocks. No executive officer of the Company served on the Boardboard of Directorsdirectors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving as members of the Company’s Board of Directors or Compensation Committee.

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth above with Company management. Based upon such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

 

Respectfully submitted,
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
Gordon L. Witter, Jr.,Paul Grinberg, Chairman
Theodore C. Allrich
John Gary Burke
Paul Grinberg
Thomas J. Pancheri

ITEM 2. NON-BINDING AND ADVISORY VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Proposal

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, enacted in July 2010, requires that we provide our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our named executives officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.

As described in greater detail under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” we seek to closely align the interests of our named executive officers with the interests of our stockholders. Our compensation programs are designed to reward our named executive officers for the achievement of short-term and long-term strategic and operational goals and the achievement of increased total stockholder return, while at the same time avoiding the encouragement of unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. We urge you to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, beginning on page 18 of this proxy statement, which discusses how the Company’s executive compensation program reflects our compensation philosophy and describes the decisions made by the Compensation Committee in 2011 in detail.

The vote on Item 2 is advisory only and it will not be binding on the Board of Directors. It is not intended to address any specific element of compensation, nor should it be construed as overruling a decision by the Board of Directors or creating or implying any change to the fiduciary duties of the Board. It will not affect any compensation previously paid or awarded to any executive. The vote relates to the compensation of our named executive officers, as described in this proxy statement in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC. The Compensation Committee and the Board may, however, take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval, in a non-binding and advisory stockholder vote, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

ITEM 3. NON-BINDING VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF NON-BINDING STOCKHOLDER VOTE ON COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Proposal

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act also provides that stockholders must be given the opportunity to vote, also on a non-binding, advisory basis, for their preference as to how frequently we should seek future advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in accordance with the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, which we refer to as an advisory “say on pay” vote. By voting on this Item No. 3, stockholders may indicate whether they would prefer that we conduct future advisory votes on executive compensation once every one, two, or three years. Stockholders also may, if they wish, abstain from casting a vote on this proposal.

Our Board has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs once every three years is the most appropriate alternative for the Company and therefore our Board recommends that you vote for a three-year interval for the advisory vote on executive compensation. In determining to recommend that stockholders vote for a frequency of once every three years, the Board considered how an advisory vote at this frequency will provide our stockholders with sufficient time to evaluate the effectiveness of our overall compensation philosophy, policies and practices in the context of our long-term business results for the corresponding period, while avoiding over-emphasis on short-term variations in compensation and business results. An advisory vote occurring once every three years will also permit our stockholders to observe and evaluate the impact of any changes to our executive compensation policies and practices that have occurred since the last advisory vote on executive compensation, including changes made in response to the outcome of a prior advisory vote on executive compensation. We will continue to engage with our stockholders regarding our executive compensation program during the period between advisory votes on executive compensation.

The Company recognizes that the stockholders may have different views as to the best approach for the Company, and therefore we look forward to hearing from our stockholders as to their preferences on the frequency of an advisory vote on executive compensation.

The proxy card provides stockholders with the opportunity to choose among four options (holding the vote every one, two or three years, or abstaining) and, therefore, stockholders will not be voting to approve or disapprove the recommendation of the Board.

This vote is advisory and not binding on the Company or our Board of Directors in any way. The Board and the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote, however, when considering the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation, the Board may decide that it is in the best interests of our stockholders and the Company to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation more or less frequently than the frequency receiving the most votes cast by our stockholders.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval, in a non-binding and advisory vote, that future non-binding and advisory stockholder vote on executive compensation shall occur every THREE YEARS.

ITEM 4. APPROVAL OF THE PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE AWARD STRUCTURE IN THE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S MAY 26, 2011 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT TO ALLOW COMPANY TO TAKE FEDERAL INCOME TAX DEDUCTIONS

On May 26, 2011, the Company amended and restated the Employment Agreement (the “Agreement”) of the President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Company, which provides for the payment of certain performance-based incentive awards. The Agreement was designed to satisfy the requirements of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”) so that the Company can take federal income tax deductions for compensation paid under the Agreement to the CEO (see “Executive Compensation—Summary Compensation Table” herein for compensation details for 2011).

Section 162(m) generally provides that publicly held companies may not take a federal income tax deduction for certain compensation in excess of $1 million paid to the CEO and the next three highest paid executives excluding the Chief Financial Officer in any one year unless that compensation is “performance-based.” One of the additional requirements of “performance-based” compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) is that the material terms of the performance goals are disclosed to, and approved by, the stockholders before the compensation is paid. Once approved, no further stockholder disclosure or approval is necessary unless the material terms of the performance goals are changed by the Compensation Committee. If the Compensation Committee changes the performance goals, the Company may need to re-disclose and again seek stockholder approval of the revised performance goals.

The Agreement is intended to provide motivation for the CEO of the Company to attain and maintain the highest standards of performance and direct his energies toward the achievement of specific business goals established for the Company and its subsidiaries. Under the terms of the Agreement (i) the Company will employ the CEO until June 30, 2015 and (ii) on and after July 1, 2011, the CEO will receive an annual base salary of $375,000. The performance-based compensation terms of the Agreement provide for (i) an Annual Cash Incentive Award based upon five performance objectives set by the Company which will be individually measured at the end of each fiscal year and could aggregate to an amount between 0% and 105% of the CEO’s base salary and (ii) a performance-based Annual Restricted Stock Unit Award equal to 40,000 shares of common stock multiplied by a factor ranging from 0 to 3 based upon the Company’s annual return on average common equity, annual asset growth and certain qualitative factors established by the Company. The CEO’s Annual Restricted Stock Unit Awards vest one-fourth each year over the next four years after date of grant. The full text of the Agreement can be found on the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed May 27, 2011.

Administration

The employment Agreement is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee has authority and discretion to administer and interpret the provisions of the Agreement. Decisions of the Compensation Committee will be final, conclusive and binding upon all parties. Within the time period prescribed by Section 162(m), for each fiscal year, the Committee will evaluate the CEO’s performance in light of the milestones and performance targets and, in their reasonable discretion, determine the amount of the Annual Cash Incentive Award based on various performance components. The components are as follows: Agreed Goals Component, Regulatory Relations Component, Asset Growth Component, Annual Growth in Core Earnings per Share Component, and Annual Return on Assets Component.

The Compensation Committee believes that the performance-based standards included in the Agreement are consistent with business achievements of top performing banks in the same class as the Company. By way of example, the CEO will need to increase the Company’s core earnings per share by 15.00%, increase assets by 15.10%, achieve an annual return on average assets (ROA) of 1.25% and achieve an annual return on average common equity (ROE) of 15.00% to earn a cash bonus of $112,500 and a restricted stock unit award of 40,000 shares that vests in the future, specifically, 10,000 shares would vest each year for four years. If the core earnings increase and the asset increase were only 10.00% and the ROA and ROE calculations were 1.00% and 10.00%, respectively, the CEO’s cash bonus would decrease 41.7% to $65,625 and his restricted stock unit award would decrease 75% to 10,000 shares, 2,500 vesting each year for four years. In addition to the Company’s earnings growth, asset growth, ROA and ROE components of the CEO’s incentive-based compensation, he has an agreed-goals component to his annual cash incentive award that pays 0% to 25% of his salary and a regulatory relations component that pays 0% to 20% of his salary based upon his success meeting specific goals.

If the Agreement’s components are approved by the shareholders, it will be effective for 2012 and will remain in effect until June 30, 2015, when the Agreement renews.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors believes that it is desirable and in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to adopt the CEO’s performance-based compensation plan structure to comply with the requirements of Section 162(m). The Board further believes that the Agreement provides an important incentive that complements the Company’s long-term plans in linking portions of executive compensation to the Company’s performance.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval of the performance-based incentive award structure in the Chief Executive Officer’s May 26, 2011 Employment Agreement to allow Company to take federal income tax deductions.

RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND OTHER MATTERS

Related Party Transaction Policy and Procedures

Pursuant to the Company’s Related Party Transaction Policy and Procedures, the Company’s Board of Directors is responsible for reviewing and approving or ratifying all related party transactions that are subject to thesuch policy. This written policy applies to certain transactions involving over $100,000 in any calendar year with related parties, which includes our officers, directors and director nominees, and members of their immediate family. The policy also applies to certain transactions with Company shareholders who own more than 5% of the Company’s stock. In determining whether to approve or ratify a related party transaction, the Board of Directors will take into account material facts of the transaction, including whether it is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to an unaffiliated third-party under the same or similar circumstances, and the extent of the related party’s interest in the transaction.

Transactions with Our Directors

In the ordinary course of its business and subject to applicable banking regulations, the Bank of Internet USA makes loans to and engages in other banking transactions including maintaining deposit accounts with its directors, officers and employees and their associates. Such loans and other banking transactions are generally made on the same terms including interest rates and collateral securing the loans, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons of comparable creditworthiness that have no affiliation with the Company or the Bank. In addition, such loansLoans are made only to persons affiliated with the Company and the Bank if they do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability of loans made to non-affiliated persons and if they do not present any other unfavorable features. The Bank offers an employee loan program available to all directors, officers and employees on a non-discriminatory basis under which each eligible employee may obtain home loans for terms of 10 years to 30 years at interest rates that are below market rates on loans made to persons unaffiliated with the Bank and the Company, provided the loan is supported by more collateral than that normally provided by unaffiliated borrowers. Loans to all directors, executive officers and employees who elected to participate in this program totaled approximately $12.2 million at June 30, 2011. All loans to directors, executive officers and employees were performing in accordance with their terms at June 30, 2011.

Legal Proceedings Involving Our Directors and Executive Officers

There were no legal proceedings involving our directors or executive officers at the date of the Proxy Statement.statement.

SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the related rules and regulations, our directors and executive officers are required to file reports of their ownership, and any changes in that ownership, with the SEC. Based solely on our review of the copies of such forms and certifications furnished to us, we believe that all of our directors and executive officers complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them during the 20102011 fiscal year, except as follows: Director RatinoffBurke filed two Form 34’s late reporting his initial ownershipthe sale of securities after joining the Board and filed one Form 4 late reporting a grant of restricted stock units; executive officer Michael Berengoltsour common stock; Director Englert filed one Form 4 late reporting the sale of our common stock.stock; Director Mosich filed one Form 4 late reporting the net-settlement of restricted stock units; Director Ratinoff filed one Form 4 late reporting the net-settlement of restricted stock units; Chief Financial Officer Micheletti filed one Form 4 late reporting the net-settlement of restricted stock units.

COMPANY STOCK PERFORMANCE

The following graph compares the stock performance of our common stock, after our initial public offering starting July 1, 2005 through June 30, 2010,2011, with that of (i) the companies included in the U.S. NASDAQ Index, and (ii) the banks included in the ABAABAQ NASDAQ Community Bank Index (ABAQ):

LOGOLOGO

The graph assumes $100 is invested in BofI common stock on July 1, 2005 and in U.S. NASDAQ Index and ABAQ Index. The indexes assume reinvestment of dividends.

ITEM 2.5. ADVISORY VOTE ON THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We are asking our shareholders, in an advisory vote, to ratify the appointmentselection of Crowe Horwath LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm(“Crowe”) to audit the Company’s financial statements for the current fiscal year.year 2012 . Ratification would be advisory only, but the Audit Committee would reconsider the appointmentselection if it were not ratified.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF CROWE HORWATH LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.

INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Crowe Horwath LLP (“Crowe”) serves as the Company’s independent auditor and has conducted the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.2011. The Audit Committee’s Charter provides that the Audit Committee must pre-approve services to be performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee approved the engagement of Crowe to serve as the Company’s independent auditor to conduct the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.2011.

A representative of Crowe will be present at the Annual Meeting, with the opportunity to make a statement if so desired, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions submitted to the Secretary of the Company in advance of the Annual Meeting.

The following table contains information regarding the aggregate fees charged to the Company by Crowe for audit services rendered in connection with the audited consolidated financial statements and reports for the 20102011 and 20092010 fiscal years.

 

  Fees Charged  Fees Charged 

Nature of Services

  2010  2009  2011   2010 

Audit fees1

  $187,000  $177,000  $195,000    $187,000  

Audit-related fees2

   120,525   59,690   45,000     120,525  

Tax fees3

   63,807   22,160   24,000     63,807  

All other fees4

   —     5,226

All other fees

   —       —    
        

 

   

 

 
  $371,332  $264,076  $264,000    $371,332  
        

 

   

 

 

 

(1)1

Audit Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s consolidated annual financial statements and review of interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and services that are normally provided by Crowe.

(2)2

Audit-Related Fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.”

(3)3

Tax Fees consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

(4)

All Other Feesconsist of fees related to a SOX database.

The Audit Committeecommittee has concluded that the provision for non-audit services listed above is compatible with maintaining the independence of Crowe.

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The Company’s Audit Committee is composed of four directors whothree directors. All the members of the Audit Committee have been found by the Board of Directors to be both independent and financially literate as required by the listing standards of the NASDAQ. In addition, the Board has determined that Mr. Grinberg is an Audit Committee Financial Expert under the rules of the SEC. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors.

The purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in its general oversight of the Company. The primary responsibilities of the Audit Committee are to oversee and monitor the integrity of the Company’s financial reporting process, financial statements and systems of internal controls; the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance; and the performance of the Company’s internal audit function. The Audit Committee is responsible for the selection, retention, supervision and termination of (i) the general auditor, including reviewing the adequacy of the authority, responsibilities and functions of the Company’s internal audit department, and (ii) the independent auditor, including resolving disagreements between management and the independent auditor. The general auditor and the independent auditor report directly to the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee is not responsible for conducting reviews of auditing or accounting procedures. Management has primary responsibility for preparing the Company’s financial statements and for the Company’s financial reporting process. The Company’s independent auditor is responsible for auditing and reporting on the conformity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee serves a board-level oversight role in which it provides advice, counsel and direction to management and the independent auditor on the basis of the information it receives, discussions with the independent auditor and the experience of the Audit Committee’s members in business, financial and accounting matters.

In this context, the Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:

1 .1. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements with management;

2 .2. The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditor the matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol.1, AU Section 380) as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T;

3 .3. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent auditor required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1, Independence Discussions with Audit Committees), as adopted by the Public Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3600T, and has discussed with the independent auditor the independent auditor’s independence; and

4 .4. Based on the review and discussions referred to in paragraphs one through three above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 20102011 for filing with the SEC.

 

Respectfully submitted,
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
Paul Grinberg, Chairman
Thomas J. Pancheri
Gordon L. Witter, Jr.
Nicholas A. Mosich

ANNUAL REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS

The Annual Report to Shareholders, including Form 10-K for the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 20102011 is being mailed concurrently with this Proxy Statement to all Shareholdersshareholders of record as of September 1, 2010.August 26, 2011. The Annual Report is not to be regarded as proxy soliciting material or as a communication by means of which any solicitation is to be made.ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THE COMPANY’S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 20102011 WILL BE PROVIDED (WITHOUT EXHIBITS) TO SHAREHOLDERS WITHOUT CHARGE UPON WRITTEN REQUEST TO THE CORPORATE SECRETARY, BOFI HOLDING, INC., 12777 HIGH BLUFF DRIVE, SUITE 100, SAN DIEGO, CA 92130. This Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2010, are also available at our website,www.bofiholding.comand from the SEC at its website,www.sec.gov.

The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries, such as brokers,allow a single copy of the proxy materials or the notice of internet availability of proxy materials to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy statements with respectbe delivered to two or more shareholdersmultiple stockholders sharing the same address by deliveringand last name, or who we reasonably believe are members of the same family and who consent to receive a single proxy statement addressed to those shareholders.copy of these materials in a manner provided by these rules. This process, whichpractice is commonly referred to as “householding,” potentially provides extra convenience for shareholders“householding” and costcan result in significant savings for companies. We send some brokers household proxy materials, delivering a single proxy statement to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected shareholders. Once you have received notice from your broker or us that they or we will be householding materials to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. of paper and mailing costs.

If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement, or if you are receiving multiple copies of the proxy statement and wish to receive only one, please notify your broker if your shares are held in a brokerage account or our agent, Broadridge, if you hold registered shares. You can notify Broadridge by sending a written request to: Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717, or by calling Broadridge at (800) 542-1061.

SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 20112012 ANNUAL MEETING

Under SEC Rule 14a-8, any shareholder desiring to submit a proposal for inclusion in our proxy materials for our 20112012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must provide the Company with a written copy of that proposal by no later than 120 days before the first anniversary of the release of Company’s proxy materials for the 20102011 Annual Meeting. However, if the date of our Annual Meeting in 20112012 changes by more than 30 days from the date on which our 20102011 Annual Meeting is held, then the deadline would be a reasonable time before we begin to print and mail our proxy materials for our 20112012 Annual Meeting. Matters pertaining to such proposals, including the number and length thereof, eligibility of persons entitled to have such proposals included and other aspects are governed by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the rules of the SEC thereunder and other laws and regulations to which interested shareholders should refer.

Our Corporate Secretary must receive timely shareholder proposals or nominations in writing at the executive offices of the Company at 12777 High Bluff Dr., Suite 100, San Diego, California 92130, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

OTHER MATTERS

We are not aware of any other matters to come before the meeting. If any other matter not mentioned in this Proxy Statement is brought before the meeting, the proxy holders named in the enclosed Proxy will have discretionary authority to vote all proxies with respect thereto in accordance with their judgment.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors,
LOGO
Gregory Garrabrants
President and Chief Executive Officer

September 27, 201020, 2011

D I R E C T I O N S

BOFI HOLDING, INC.

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

October 21, 201020, 2011

Estancia La JollaMarriott Hotel

9700 N. Torrey Pines RoadCarmel Valley/Del Mar

La Jolla,11966 El Camino Real

San Diego, California 9203792130

Parking at Estancia La Jolla Hotel will be by valet only. The cost of valet parking, including gratuity, will be covered by the Company - your valet ticket will be validated upon registration.at the Annual Meeting registration table.

LOGOLOGO

 

From the North – Del Mar

 

From the South – Downtown San Diego

Take Interstate 5 South I-5

Exit at Genesee Ave

Take Genesee Ave West (Right)Del Mar Heights Road - Exit 34

Turn Left on N Torrey Pines Rdleft into Del Mar Heights Road

Turn Rightright into El Camino Real

The Marriott Hotel is on Estancia La Jolla/Pangea Drthe right at

11966 El Camino Real

 

Take Interstate 5 North I-5

Exit at Genesee AveCarmel Valley Road - Exit 33

Turn right into Carmel Valley Road

Take Genesee Ave West (Left)the 2nd left onto El Camino Real

Turn LeftThe Marriott Hotel is on N Torrey Pines Rdthe left at

Turn Right on Estancia La Jolla/Pangea Dr11966 El Camino Real


PROXY

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR THE ANNUAL

2011 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SHAREHOLDERS

BofI Holding, Inc.

October 21, 201020, 2011

The undersigned hereby appoints Jerry F. EnglertPaul Grinberg and Nicholas A. MosichEdward J. Ratinoff or any one of them with full power of substitution, proxies to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of BOFIBofI Holding, Inc. (the “Company”) to be held October 21, 201020, 2011 at 2:00 PM, local time, and at any adjournment thereof, hereby revoking any proxies heretofore given, to vote all shares of Common Stock of the Company held or owned by the undersigned as directed on the reverse side of this proxy card, and in their discretion upon such other matters as may come before the meeting.

 

1.Election of Directors.Directors. To elect the following twothree nominees to serve as Class III DirectorsI directors for a three-year term until the 20132014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their successors are elected and have qualified:

Edward J. Ratinoff                                                                                                          Gordon L. Witter, Jr.

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Theodore C. Allrich

¨  FOR all nominees listedJohn Gary Burke ¨Nicholas A. Mosich  WITHHOLD vote for all nominees listed¨  *EXCEPTIONS

*(Instruction: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark the “Exceptions” box and write that nominee’s name on the space provided below.)

2.Ratification of Crowe Horwath LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year.

 

¨  FOR all nominees listed¨  WITHHOLD AUTHORITY for all nominees listed¨  FOR all nominees listed EXCEPT:*

*Instruction: To withhold authority to vote for some nominees, mark this box and write the name(s) of the nominee(s) you are withholding authority for in the space provided below.

2.Non-Binding, Advisory Vote on the Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers.To vote on the following resolution:

¨ FOR ¨ AGAINST ¨ ABSTAIN

3.Non-Binding Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Non-Binding Stockholder Vote on Compensation of the Company’s Named Executive Officers. Advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on compensation (check appropriate box):

¨ Every Year¨ Every Two Years¨ Every Three Years¨ Abstain

4.Approval of the Performance-Based Incentive Award Structure in the President and CEO’s May 26, 2011 Employment Agreement.To vote on the approval of the performance-based incentive award structure in the President and CEO May 26, 2011 employment agreement to allow the Company to take federal income tax deductions for performance-based compensation paid in accordance with the employment agreement:

¨ FOR¨ AGAINST¨ ABSTAIN

5.Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. Advisory vote to ratify the selection of Crowe Horwath LLP to audit the Company’s financial statements for fiscal year 2012.

¨ FOR¨ AGAINST¨ ABSTAIN

6.Other Business. To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

The Board recommends that you vote as follows: Item 1 -FOR the above election of directorsall nominees for directors; Item 2 –FORthe resolution approving the compensation of the named executive officers; Item 3 – check the box “Every Three Years”; Item 4 –FOR the approval of the structure of the CEO’s performance-based compensation; and Item 5 –FORthe ratificationadvisory vote to ratify the appointment of Crowe Horwath LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.to audit the company’s financial statements. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed above. you direct.WHEN NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FORAS THE ELECTIONBOARD OF DIRECTORS AND“FOR”RECOMMENDS THE RATIFICATION OF CROWE HORWATH LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM.. This proxy may be revoked by the undersigned at any time, prior to the time it is voted, by any of the means described in the accompanying proxy statement.

Date and sign exactly as name(s) appear(s) on this proxy. If you are signing for an estate, a trust, a corporation or other type of entity, your title or capacity should be stated. If shares are held jointly, each holder should sign.

 

Date:   20102011
  
 Signature 
  
 Signature